Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Workup bias in prediction research.

R J Panzer, A L Suchman, P F Griner

    Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    |April 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A new measure of the impact of managed care on healthcare markets.

    The American journal of managed care·2001
    Same author

    Error reduction, complex systems and organizational change.

    Journal of general internal medicine·2001
    Same author

    Lawyers, litigation, and liability: can they make patients safer?

    Neurology·2001
    Same author

    Medicine and religion.

    The New England journal of medicine·2001
    Same author

    The influence of health care organizations on well-being.

    The Western journal of medicine·2001
    Same author

    The effects of a changing environment on relationships between medical schools and their parent universities.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
    Same journal

    Flexible Survival Extrapolation with Blended Hazards: Accounting for Treatment Effect Waning in Health Technology Assessment.

    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
    Same journal

    A Microsimulation Model for Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the United States: Michigan Model for Diabetes-Chronic Kidney Disease Model.

    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
    Same journal

    Cardiovascular Risk Estimation and Statin Adherence: A Historical Cohort Study.

    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
    Same journal

    Taste or Scale? Methodological Approach to Health Preferences Comparison across Groups.

    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
    Same journal

    Mind the Gap: Impact of New Labels on Public Perceptions and Calculated Risk of Adverse Outcomes after a Melanoma In Situ Diagnosis-A Secondary Analysis of an Online Randomized Experiment.

    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
    Same journal

    A Metamodel-Based General-Purpose Autocalibration Tool for Simulation Models.

    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
    See all related articles

    Workup bias can distort clinical prediction research, falsely lowering the accuracy of early findings for predicting stroke complications like intracerebral hemorrhage. Awareness and careful interpretation are crucial for reliable medical research.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical research methodology
    • Clinical prediction modeling
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Many clinical studies report weak predictive power for established predictors.
    • Workup bias is a potential explanation for these diminished predictive abilities.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate how workup bias impacts the predictive accuracy of early clinical findings.
    • To specifically model the effects of workup bias on predicting intracerebral hemorrhage in stroke patients.

    Main Methods:

    • Simulated a biased sample to assess the influence of workup bias.
    • Modeled the effects on clinical findings that guide the use of a "gold standard" diagnostic test.
    • Evaluated changes in operating characteristics, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Workup bias distorted operating characteristics for key clinical findings.
    • Sensitivity was artificially increased in the simulated biased sample.
    • Specificity and likelihood ratios were decreased due to workup bias.

    Conclusions:

    • Workup bias can significantly and spuriously reduce the perceived predictive value of clinical findings.
    • It is essential for researchers to recognize, identify, and account for workup bias.
    • Careful interpretation of study results is necessary when workup bias may be present.