Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

28:13
Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
33.5K
Left Atrial Appendage Amputation for Atrial Fibrillation during Aortic Valve Replacement
Jurij M Kalisnik1,2, Giuseppe Santarpino3,4,5, Andrea I Balbierer3
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|June 24, 2022
Summary
Left atrial appendage (LAA) amputation during aortic valve replacement (AVR) significantly lowers ischemic stroke risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This procedure does not increase periprocedural risks, making it a valuable addition to AVR surgery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Thromboembolic Disease Research
Background:
- Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is known to reduce stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
- Current guidelines offer only a soft recommendation ('may be considered') for LAA occlusion during cardiac surgery.
- Patients with AF and aortic stenosis undergoing biological aortic valve replacement (AVR) face a high thromboembolic risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of LAA amputation in reducing thromboembolic risk.
- To assess the safety and impact of LAA amputation in patients undergoing biological AVR for aortic stenosis and AF.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of two patient cohorts undergoing biological AVR: one with LAA amputation and one without.
- Patients were matched based on baseline characteristics.
- Data collection included hospital records, with follow-up via telephone or in-person interviews to assess 30-day and long-term outcomes.
Main Results:
- LAA amputation was associated with a significantly lower incidence of cumulative and late ischemic stroke (6.4% vs. 25%, p=0.028 and 3.2% vs. 20%, p=0.008, respectively).
- No significant differences were found in postoperative stroke, re-exploration for bleeding, late pericardial effusion, in-hospital mortality, or all-cause mortality between the groups.
- The study included 157 patients, with 74 matched pairs analyzed for outcomes over a median follow-up of 45-48 months.
Conclusions:
- Concomitant LAA amputation during biological AVR in patients with AF and aortic stenosis significantly reduces ischemic stroke risk.
- LAA amputation does not introduce additional periprocedural risks, enhancing the clinical benefits of AVR.
- Omitting LAA amputation in minimally invasive procedures for this patient population is discouraged to maximize patient outcomes.

