Dental trauma simulation training using four splinting models: A cross sectional study.

Area of Science:

• Dental Education
• Traumatology
• Restorative Dentistry

Background:

• Clinical experience in managing traumatic dental injuries is limited for dental students.
• Newly graduated dentists often face challenges with their initial trauma patients.
• This study addresses the need for practical training in dental trauma management.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate dental students' perceptions of handling four flexible splints for tooth avulsion.
• To compare the ease of use of composite resin versus glass ionomer cement for splint bonding.
• To assess the value of simulated trauma exercises in dental education.

Main Methods:

• Fourth-year dental students (n=161) performed simulated avulsed tooth splinting.
• Four splint types were used: orthodontic wire, Twistflex wire, nylon fishing line, and Powermesh.
• Two bonding agents were tested: composite resin and glass ionomer cement.
• Students provided feedback via Likert scale and open-ended questions.

Main Results:

• The majority of students found the simulation exercise beneficial for learning and engaging.
• A significant portion felt the simulation added value compared to didactic training alone.
• Powermesh splints with composite bonding were rated as the easiest to place.
• Nylon fishing line splints with glass ionomer cement were found to be the easiest to remove.

Conclusions:

• Wire-free splints, particularly Powermesh with composite bonding, are perceived as easier for students to place.
• Glass ionomer cement demonstrates ease of removal, which is a critical factor in trauma management.
• Simulated exercises enhance dental student preparedness for managing traumatic dental injuries.