Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

05:37
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
2.2K
The minimizer Jaccard estimator is biased and inconsistent.
Mahdi Belbasi1, Antonio Blanca1, Robert S Harris2
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|June 27, 2022
Summary
The minimizer sketch, used for sequence similarity estimation, is biased and inconsistent. This bias can significantly impact accuracy, affecting tools like mashmap.
Area of Science:
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
- Genomics
Background:
- Sequence sketching is crucial for efficient data processing in bioinformatics.
- Minimizer sketches offer scalability but raise concerns about accuracy and bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the minimizer sketch for Jaccard similarity estimation.
- To analyze the bias and consistency of the minimizer Jaccard estimator.
Main Methods:
- Theoretical derivation of an analytical formula for minimizer sketch bias.
- Empirical validation of bias across various sequence families.
- Assessment of the impact of bias on the mashmap read mapping tool.
Main Results:
- The minimizer Jaccard estimator is proven to be biased and inconsistent.
- Bias is dependent on the layout of shared k-mers within sequences.
- Substantial bias observed, potentially doubling the estimate compared to the true Jaccard similarity.
- Demonstrated negative impact on mashmap read mapping accuracy.
Conclusions:
- The minimizer sketch introduces significant bias in Jaccard similarity estimation.
- This bias necessitates careful consideration when using minimizer sketches for sequence analysis.
- Findings have implications for the reliability of k-mer based bioinformatics tools.
Related Concept Videos
Confidence Intervals
7.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
A...
7.1K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
8.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.0K
Margin of Error
4.5K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
4.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
633
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
633
Random and Systematic Errors
12.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.3K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
1.9K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.9K

