Evaluation of residue variability in a conformation-specific context and during evolutionary sequence reconstruction

Felipe A M Otsuka1,2, Sinisa Bjelic1

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

Insights

Drug resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) can emerge from mutations in the Abl1 tyrosine kinase domain. Understanding these mutations

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Acquired resistance to targeted therapies, particularly small molecule inhibitors, is a significant clinical challenge in diseases like chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).
  • The Abl1 tyrosine kinase, constitutively active in CML, is a primary target, but mutations in its kinase domain (Abl1-KD) lead to drug resistance and patient relapse.
  • Emergence of resistance mutations is linked to distinct conformational states of Abl1-KD: inactive, active, and an intermediate inactive state.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how selection pressure during drug treatment determines resistant positions and amino acid identities in Abl1-KD.
  • To computationally evaluate the impact of mutations on Abl1-KD conformational stability and energy.
  • To inform future drug development and treatment strategies for CML by understanding resistance mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • In silico site-saturation mutagenesis was performed on the Abl1-KD structure within a conformational context.
  • Evaluation of in situ and conformational stability energy changes upon mutation.
  • Ancestral reconstruction analysis to explore sequence variability at resistant positions.

Main Results:

  • Seven out of eleven studied resistant positions showed mutations favoring the active conformation of Abl1-KD over the inactive state.
  • Simultaneous sequence optimization at resistant positions identified five known resistant mutations, all favoring the active conformation.
  • Ancestral reconstruction revealed diminished neutral genetic drift at resistant positions, suggesting selection pressure against variability.

Conclusions:

  • Abl1 resistance mechanisms are driven by substitutions that promote the active conformation of the kinase domain.
  • Computational approaches combining mutagenesis and ancestral reconstruction can identify resistance-driving mutations and predict conformational preferences.
  • Limiting the sequence space available for resistance mutations through targeted strategies could lead to more durable therapeutic outcomes in CML.