Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Do femoral version abnormalities play a role in hip function of patients with hip pain?
Viviane Bortoluzzi Frasson1, Walter Herzog2, Kelly Johnston3
1Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Physique - Physical Therapy Centre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Background:
A high prevalence of femoral version abnormalities has been observed in hip pain patients, with impact on hip range of motion and muscle strength that should be elucidated.
Methods:
Cross-sectional study. Thirty-one patients with hip pain (16 men and 15 female) were subjected to Biplanar X-Rays to quantify femoral version using three-dimensional measurements. The 62 hips were divided into normal version (10-20°, n = 18), anteverted (>20°, n = 19), and retroverted (<10°, n = 25). Joint range of motion for flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation was assessed through digital goniometry. Maximal isometric hip strength (flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation at 0° and 30°, abduction, adduction) was evaluated through hand-held dynamometry. Hip rotation index was calculated as external rotation minus internal rotation.
Findings:
Anteverted hips had greater internal rotation, while retroverted hips had greater external rotation (p = 0.001). Anteverted hips were weaker than retroverted hips for external rotation at 30° (p < 0.001), abduction (p = 0.006) and adduction (p < 0.001), and weaker than normal version hips for extension (p = 0.018). All three groups had different rotation index: retroverted>normal>anteverted (p < 0.001). The ordinal logistic regression found higher values of rotation index with higher probability of being retroverted (common odds ratio = 1.20). There was a strong correlation between femoral version group and rotation index (rS = 0.76, p < 0.001). There was probability >70% of a hip being anteverted if the rotation index was <11°, and being retroverted if the index was >40°.
Interpretation:
Range of motion and muscle strength differed in hips with different femoral versions. The hip rotation index was a strong femoral version predictor.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
08:15Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023