Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interpretable predictions from whole-body FDG-PET/CT using parameters associated with clinical outcome.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Reinforcement learning for real-time adaptive radiotherapy.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2026
Same author

Enhancing online adaptive radiotherapy with uncertainty based segmentation error and out-of-distribution detection.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Impact of genetic variants linked to liver fat and liver volume on MRI-mapped body composition.

JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology·2025
Same author

Causal effects of obesity on estimated glomerular filtration rate: a Mendelian randomization and image data analysis study.

Clinical kidney journal·2025
Same author

Whole-body tumor segmentation from FDG-PET/CT: Leveraging a segmentation prior from tissue-wise projections.

Heliyon·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.9K

Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy.

Samuel Fransson1,2, David Tilly1,3, Robin Strand2,4

  • 1Department of Medical Physics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
|June 30, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Patient-specific artificial neural networks (ANNs) offer a solution for contouring in adaptive MR-Linac workflows. These ANNs achieve accuracy comparable to traditional deformable image registration (DIR) for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

366
Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images
06:48

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Published on: January 7, 2019

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 6, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.9K
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

366
Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images
06:48

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Published on: January 7, 2019

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Technology
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Background:

  • Daily contouring is essential for MR-Linac radiotherapy treatments.
  • Deformable image registration (DIR) struggles with significant anatomical changes during treatment.
  • Artificial neural networks (ANNs) require large datasets, posing a challenge for contouring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose patient-specific ANNs for contouring in adaptive MR-Linac workflows.
  • To address the challenge of limited training data in ANN-based contouring.
  • To evaluate the performance of patient-specific ANNs against DIR methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed U-net shaped ANN models trained on initial treatment fraction images for each patient.
  • Applied patient-specific ANNs to subsequent treatment fraction images for contouring.
  • Compared ANN contouring accuracy (Dice coefficient, Added Path Length) with manual contours and DIR algorithm results.

Main Results:

  • ANN models achieved Dice coefficients of 0.92 ± 0.03 (CTV), 0.93 ± 0.07 (bladder), and 0.84 ± 0.10 (rectum).
  • DIR achieved Dice coefficients of 0.95 ± 0.03 (CTV), 0.93 ± 0.08 (bladder), and 0.88 ± 0.06 (rectum).
  • Added Path Length (APL) values were comparable between ANN and DIR methods for all structures.

Conclusions:

  • Patient-specific ANNs demonstrate comparable accuracy to clinical DIR for contouring in MR-Linac treatments.
  • This approach effectively mitigates data scarcity issues for ANN training.
  • Patient-specific ANNs show promise for adaptive radiotherapy workflows.