Related Experiment Videos
Methods Used to Compare Narrative Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Scoping Review.
Mohammadreza Azarpira1, Akram Redjdal1, Jacques Bouaud2,1
1Sorbonne Université, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des connaissances en e-Santé, LIMICS, F-75006 Paris, France.
Regularly updating clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is crucial for clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). This review evaluates methods for comparing CPGs, highlighting the role of expert knowledge in ensuring accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Medical Informatics
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) require up-to-date clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for optimal performance.
- The frequent renewal of international CPGs necessitates efficient methods for updating national guidelines and ensuring alignment with the latest evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review evaluating existing methods for comparing two clinical practice guidelines.
- To identify and assess techniques for extracting CPG components and comparing guidelines at various levels of abstraction.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search for methods used in comparing CPGs was performed.
- The review considered both computerized and semi-computerized approaches for CPG comparison and component extraction.
- Scoping review methodology was employed to synthesize findings.
Main Results:
- Various methods for extracting CPG components and comparing guidelines were identified.
- Both automated and semi-automated techniques were recognized as viable approaches.
- Expert knowledge remains essential for evaluating comparisons, particularly for semantic rule extraction and inconsistency resolution.
Conclusions:
- Computerized comparison of clinical guidelines offers an effective solution for managing the growing volume of medical data and CPGs.
- While automated methods show promise, expert judgment is indispensable for validating comparisons and addressing complex issues like semantic inconsistencies.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...