Concurrent validity of the short-form Family Impact Scale (FIS-8) in 4-year-old US children

W M Thomson1, L A Foster Page2, S M Levy3

  • 1Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, The University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. murray.thomson@otago.ac.nz.

BMC Pediatrics
|July 5, 2022
PubMed

Insights

The Family Impact Scale-8 (FIS-8) shows good reliability for assessing a child's oral health impact on US families. Further research is recommended for diverse pediatric populations.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Dentistry
  • Family Health Outcomes
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Limited US data exists on the validity and reliability of the short-form Family Impact Scale (FIS-8).
  • The FIS-8 measures the impact of a child's oral condition on their family.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the reliability and validity of the FIS-8 in a US child population.
  • To provide data on the FIS-8's utility for family impact assessment in pediatric oral health.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional analysis of 422 US child-caregiver dyads from a multi-center cohort study.
  • Assessed family impact at child age 48 months using the FIS-8.
  • Evaluated internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and concurrent validity against global health and family impact items.

Main Results:

  • The FIS-8 demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.83).
  • Concurrent validity was supported by consistent gradients in FIS-8 scores correlating with the child's oral health status.
  • Gradients for the global family impact item were inconsistent.

Conclusions:

  • The FIS-8 shows promising utility for assessing family impact related to a child's oral condition in a US context.
  • Replication in samples of preschoolers with higher disease prevalence is recommended to further establish validity.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
448
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
2.0K
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence01:23

Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

David Wechsler, a psychologist who worked with World War I veterans, developed a significant IQ test in 1939 called the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. This test was innovative because it combined several subtests that measured both verbal and nonverbal skills, reflecting Wechsler's belief that intelligence is a global capacity involving purposeful action, rational thinking, and effective interaction with the environment. This test later evolved into the Wechsler Adult Intelligence...
1.6K