Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Assessment of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Paddy Field by Means of Static Closed Chambers Maintaining Plants Within Headspace
Published on: September 6, 2018
[Methane Production Potential and Methanogenic Pathways in Paddy Soils Under Different Rice-based Cropping Systems]
Wan-Yu Shen1,2, Qiong Huang1,2, Jing Ma1
1State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China.
Abstract:
Differences inmethane (CH4) production potential in paddy soils under different rice-based cropping systems and especially in the methanogenic pathways (mainly acetate fermentation and CO2/H2 reduction) remain unclear. Anaerobic incubations of soil with or without fluoromethane (CH3F) inhibitor (2% and 0%) were conducted. With the soils from three typical paddy ecosystems (rice-wheat rotation, RW; rice-fallow, RF; double-rice, DR) in China, the cumulative concentration of CH4 production, CH4 production potential, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content, and acetic acid content were determined. Meanwhile, the relative contribution of acetate-dependent methanogenesis (fac) was quantified using the stable carbon isotope method. The results showed that the CH4 production potential was 7.18 μg·(g·d)-1 in RF, which was significantly lower than that in RW[10.33 μg·(g·d)-1]and DR[13.42 μg·(g·d)-1] (P<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that CH4 production potential was significantly negatively correlated with soil cation exchange capacity and pH (P<0.01); the addition of CH3F significantly inhibited CH4 production (P<0.05). The content of DOC and acetic acid in DR were 255 mg·kg-1 and 7.34 mg·kg-1, respectively, which were 17%-51% and 22%-23% higher than those in RW and RF, respectively. The δ13CH4 and δ13CO2 values were affected greatly by different rice-based cropping systems, and the highest δ13CH4 value was -43.89‰ in RF, which was more positive than that of RW and DR by 11.06‰ and 8.33‰, respectively (P<0.05). By contrast, the lowest value of δ13CO2 was observed in RF, which was more negative than that of RW (7.63‰) and DR (5.14‰) (P<0.05). The α(CO values of RW and RF were 1.057 and 1.058, respectively, which were significantly lower than 1.062 in DR (P<0.05). The fac values of RF ranged from 84% to 98%, being 34%-38% and 20%-23% higher than those of RW and DR, respectively (P<0.05).
Related Concept Videos
Overview of Archaea
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms

