Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

551
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
551
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

62.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
62.5K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

198
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
198
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

779
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
779
Introduction to Learning01:18

Introduction to Learning

523
Learning is the process of acquiring knowledge or skills through practice or experience, leading to long-lasting behavioral changes. This acquisition occurs through interaction with the environment and requires practice or experience. For instance, mastering a skill such as surfing requires considerable practice and experience, highlighting the essential role of repeated interactions with the environment in learning.
In contrast to learned behaviors, unlearned behaviors such as crying, sexual...
523
Structural Classification of Joints01:20

Structural Classification of Joints

3.9K
Joints, also known as articulations, are classified based on their structural characteristics, i.e., based on whether the articulating surfaces of the adjacent bones are directly connected by fibrous connective tissue or cartilage, or whether the articulating surfaces contact each other within a fluid-filled joint cavity. These differences serve to divide the joints of the body into three structural classifications.
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social group discovery, structure, and stereotype updating.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Why partisans feel hated: Distinct static and dynamic relationships with animosity meta-perceptions.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Transmission of social bias through observational learning.

Science advances·2024
Same author

A research agenda for understanding how social inequality is linked to brain structure and function.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19.

Nature·2023
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.7K

Latent structure learning as an alternative computation for group inference.

Mina Cikara1

  • 1Psychology Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. mcikara@fas.harvard.eduhttps://www.intergroupneurosciencelaboratory.com.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|July 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Latent structure learning explains group inference without needing conflict or observing coalitions. This approach demonstrates how non-conflict groups form, supported by human behavior experiments.

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.9K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.7K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.9K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Traditional models of group inference often rely on conflict or observed coalitional behavior.
  • Pietraszewski's account emphasizes conflict as a driver for understanding group dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate an alternative model for group inference based on latent structure learning.
  • To demonstrate that group inference can occur without necessitating conflict or explicit observation of coalitions.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of latent structure learning.
  • Experimental design involving human participants to test group inference mechanisms.
  • Analysis of behavioral data to support the proposed model.

Main Results:

  • Latent structure learning provides a viable mechanism for group inference independent of conflict.
  • Experimental evidence supports the model's ability to explain how individuals infer group membership in non-conflict scenarios.
  • The findings contrast with accounts requiring explicit coalitional behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Group inference can be explained through latent structure learning, offering a broader framework than conflict-based models.
  • This research highlights the cognitive processes underlying the formation of non-conflict-based groups.
  • The study provides empirical support for a more inclusive theory of social cognition and group dynamics.