Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Second Order systems I01:20

Second Order systems I

226
A servo system exemplifies a second-order system, featuring a proportional controller and load elements that ensure the output position aligns with the input position. The relationship between these components is described by a second-order differential equation. Applying the Laplace transform under zero initial conditions yields the transfer function, showing how inputs are converted to outputs in the system.
By reinterpreting the system, one can derive the closed-loop transfer function, which...
226
PI Controller: Design01:24

PI Controller: Design

469
Proportional Integral (PI) controllers are a fundamental component in modern control systems, widely used to enhance performance and mitigate steady-state errors. They are particularly effective in applications such as automatic brightness adjustment on smartphones, where they excel at mitigating steady-state errors for step-function inputs. Unlike PD controllers, which require time-varying errors to function optimally, PI controllers leverage their integral component to address residual...
469
Second Order systems II01:18

Second Order systems II

165
In an underdamped second-order system, where the damping ratio ζ is between 0 and 1, a unit-step input results in a transfer function that, when transformed using the inverse Laplace method, reveals the output response. The output exhibits a damped sinusoidal oscillation, and the difference between the input and output is termed the error signal. This error signal also demonstrates damped oscillatory behavior. Eventually, as the system reaches a steady state, the error diminishes to zero.
165
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control01:27

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control

196
Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers are essential in many control systems to improve stability and performance. They are commonly used in everyday devices like thermostats to enhance system damping and reduce steady-state error. When the zero in the controller's transfer function is optimally placed, the system benefits significantly in terms of stability and accuracy.
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires...
196
PD Controller: Design01:26

PD Controller: Design

339
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
339
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

174
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
174

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Periodic disturbance rejection-based control of Switched Reluctance Motors Using ADRC and IMP for effective ripple reduction.

ISA transactions·2025
Same author

Discrete FIR filter-based Control.

ISA transactions·2025
Same author

Active disturbance rejection control based on a cascade estimator composed of reduced-order and full-order extended state observers.

ISA transactions·2024
Same author

Robust fractional Active Disturbance Rejection Control: A unified approach.

ISA transactions·2020
Same author

Generalized proportional integral control for periodic signals under active disturbance rejection approach.

ISA transactions·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.7K

On the equivalence between Generalized Proportional Integral Observer and Disturbance Observer.

Harvey David Rojas1, John Cortés-Romero1

  • 1Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Av. Cra. 30 # 45-03, Bogotá, Colombia.

ISA Transactions
|July 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals the equivalence between generalized proportional integral observers (GPIO) and disturbance observers (DOB). This finding enables a deeper understanding of observer performance and robustness in control systems.

Keywords:
Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC)Disturbance observer (DOB)Extended state observer (ESO)Generalized proportional integral observer (GPIO)Robustness and performance analysis

More Related Videos

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

13.8K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.7K
An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

13.8K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.0K

Area of Science:

  • Control Systems Engineering
  • Observer Theory
  • Power Electronics

Background:

  • Generalized Proportional Integral Observers (GPIO) and Disturbance Observers (DOB) are crucial for estimating system states and disturbances.
  • Understanding the relationship between different observer types is essential for optimizing control strategies.
  • Reduced-order GPIO (ROGPIO), full-order GPIO (FOGPIO), and Extended State Observers (ESO) are widely used but their interrelations require clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish and analyze the frequency-domain equivalence between GPIO and DOB.
  • To investigate the impact of system parameters on GPIO robustness and performance.
  • To compare ROGPIO and FOGPIO within the Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) framework.

Main Methods:

  • Frequency-domain analysis to establish observer equivalence.
  • Systematic investigation of parameters like system order, extended states, and control gain uncertainty.
  • Comparative analysis of ROGPIO and FOGPIO in ADRC.
  • Experimental validation using a synchronous buck converter.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated equivalence between GPIO and DOB across various observer configurations (ROGPIO, FOGPIO, ESO).
  • Quantified the influence of system order, extended states, control gain uncertainty, and tuning on observer robustness and performance.
  • Provided a detailed comparison of ROGPIO and FOGPIO within ADRC, highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses.
  • Experimental results validated the theoretical findings for a synchronous buck converter.

Conclusions:

  • The established equivalence simplifies the analysis and design of observers.
  • The study provides guidelines for selecting and tuning observers for improved robustness and performance.
  • Findings are directly applicable to enhancing control strategies in power electronics and other complex systems.