Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure01:26

Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

70
Preoperative ManagementThe primary goals of preoperative management in kidney transplantation are to optimize the patient’s metabolic state and prepare them for surgery through diet adjustments, necessary dialysis, and tailored medical treatment. This phase also involves comprehensive infection screening and patient education about the surgical procedure and postoperative care to improve outcomes and adherence.Medical ManagementA comprehensive evaluation is required for both the living...
70

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Empirical Assessment of the Cost of Dichotomization of the Outcome of Clinical Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Randomization and placebo effects in clinical trials of major depressive disorder.

Translational psychiatry·2025
Same author

The analysis of continuous data from n-of-1 trials using paired cycles: a simple tutorial.

Trials·2024
Same author

Student and the Lanarkshire milk experiment.

European journal of epidemiology·2022
Same author

Conditions for success and margins of error: Estimation in clinical trials.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same author

A note regarding alternative explanations for heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same journal

Impact of Information Leakage in Platform Trials With Survival Endpoints on Type I Error Control.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Harmonic Fowlkes-Mallows Index for Medical Diagnostics Tests and Optimal Cut-Off Point Selection of Binary Diseases.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Early Phase Dose-Finding Designs for CAR-T Cell Therapies.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Randomization Ratios in Clinical Trials With Survival Endpoints.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

CUI-MET: A Clinical Utility Index Based Analysis and Decision Framework for Dose Optimization in Multiple-Dose, Multiple-Outcome Randomized Trials.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Will the Pharmaceutical Industry Need Statisticians in an AI World?

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification
10:59

Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification

Published on: July 26, 2019

22.7K

Viewpoint: Do not resurrect the two-stage procedure.

Stephen Senn1

  • 1School of Health and Related Research, Medical Statistics Group, University of Sheffield, Edinburgh, UK.

Pharmaceutical Statistics
|July 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The two-stage procedure for analyzing cross-over trials is unacceptable, as demonstrated by Peter Freeman in 1989. This note uses simulations to explain why this flawed method should be avoided in statistical analysis.

Keywords:
cross-over trialerror inflationinferencepretesting

More Related Videos

A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
05:57

A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.5K
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification
10:59

Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification

Published on: July 26, 2019

22.7K
A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
05:57

A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.5K
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • The two-stage procedure for analyzing cross-over trials, widely accepted previously, was challenged by Peter Freeman in 1989.
  • Freeman highlighted serious flaws, leading to its rejection by many statisticians.
  • Despite its known issues, the two-stage procedure is still encountered in practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the statistical flaws inherent in the two-stage procedure for cross-over trial analysis.
  • To reinforce why this method is unacceptable and should be discontinued.
  • To advocate for the use of alternative, statistically sound methods like the Bayesian approach recommended by Grieve.

Main Methods:

  • A simple simulation was employed to illustrate the deficiencies of the two-stage procedure.
  • The simulation aimed to provide a clear, understandable demonstration of the flaws identified by Freeman.
  • Comparison with recommended Bayesian methods was implicitly considered.

Main Results:

  • The simulation confirmed the unacceptability of the two-stage procedure.
  • The results visually and statistically demonstrate the critical errors associated with its application.
  • The findings underscore the validity of Freeman's original critique.

Conclusions:

  • The two-stage procedure for cross-over trials is statistically unsound and should not be used.
  • Peter Freeman's 1989 findings remain relevant, highlighting persistent issues in statistical practice.
  • Researchers should adopt robust methods, such as Bayesian analysis, for cross-over trial evaluations.