Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
Test of a Retinal Nerve Fiber Bundle Trajectory Model Using Eyes With Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy
Zane Zenon Zemborain1,2, Emmanouil Tsamis1, Sol La Bruna1
1Department of Psychology, Columbia University, Schermerhorn Hall, New York, NY, USA.
Purpose:
To test a model of retinal nerve fiber bundle trajectories that predicts the arcuate-shaped patterns seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) probability/deviation maps (p-maps) in glaucomatous eyes.
Methods:
Thirty-one glaucomatous eyes from a database of 250 eyes had clear arcuate-shaped patterns on RNFL p-maps derived from an OCT cube scan. The borders of the arcuate patterns were extracted from the RNFL p-maps. Next, the trajectories from an arcuate model were compared against these borders via a normalized root-mean-square difference analysis. The model's parameter, β, was varied, and the best-fitting, initial clock-hour position of the trajectory to the border was found for each β. Finally, the regions, as determined by the arcuate border's best-fit, initial clock-hour positions, were compared against the abnormal regions on the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) profile.
Results:
The arcuate model's mean βSup and βInf parameters minimized large differences between the trajectories and the arcuate borders on the RNFL p-maps. Furthermore, on average, 68% of the cpRNFL regions defined by the arcuate border's best-fit, initial clock-hour positions were abnormal (i.e., below the ≤5% threshold).
Conclusions:
The arcuate model performed well in predicting the borders of arcuate patterns seen on RNFL p-maps. It also predicted the associated abnormal regions of the cpRNFL thickness plots.
Translational Relevance:
This model should prove useful in helping clinicians understand topographical comparisons among different OCT representations and should improve structure-structure, as well as structure-function agreement analyses.

