Application of a virtual reality tracker-based system to measure seated postural stability in stroke patients
Huey-Wen Liang1, Tzu-Ling Tai2, Yue-Hua Li2
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. lianghw@ntu.edu.tw.
Background:
Postural stability while sitting is an important indicator of balance and an early predictor for future functional improvement in neurorehabilitation, but the evaluation is usually dependent on clinical balance function measures. Meanwhile, instrumental posturography has been used widely to obtain quantitative data and characterize balance abilities and underlying control mechanisms, but not as often for sitting balance. Moreover, traditional kinetic methods using a force platform to test sitting stability often require modification and are costly. We proposed a tracker-based posturography with a commercial virtual reality system, the VIVE Pro system (HTC, Inc. Taiwan), to record the trunk displacement (TD) path with a lumbar tracker for evaluation of sitting stability. The goals were to test the reliability and validity of the TD parameters among stroke patients.
Methods:
Twenty-one stroke individuals and 21 healthy adults had their postural sway measured with this system under four sitting conditions, i.e., sitting on a solid surface or a soft surface, with eyes open or closed. The test-retest reliability of the TD parameters was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients in 22 participants. We also tested the discriminative validity of these parameters to discriminate between stroke and healthy controls, and among four sitting conditions. Furthermore, the TD parameters were correlated with the three balance function tests: the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) and the Function in Sitting Test (FIST).
Results:
The results indicated that the TD parameters obtained by tracker-based posturography had mostly moderate to good reliability across the four conditions, with a few exceptions in the solid surface and eyes open tasks. The TD parameters could discriminate the postural stability between sitting on solid and soft surfaces. The stroke group had more seated postural sway than the control group, especially while sitting on a soft surface. In addition, velocity measures in the sagittal and frontal planes had moderate to high correlations with the PASS and BBS scores.
Conclusions:
This tracker-based system is a cost-effective option for the clinical assessment of body stability for stroke patients in a seated position and shows acceptable reliability and validity.
