Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

06:06
Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy and Probiotic Lactobacillus Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontitis and Peri-Implant Disease
Published on: May 9, 2022
2.6K
Laser applications in smear layer removal from posterior root canals: A comparative study
Evrykleia Kourti1, Ourania Papadopoulou-Pantelidou1, Kosmas Tolidis2
1Department of Endodontology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Journal of Conservative Dentistry : JCD
|July 15, 2022
Summary
Erbium lasers did not fully remove smear layer from molar root canals. Chelating agents may aid laser effectiveness in narrow, curved canals.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Dental Laser Technology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Smear layer removal is crucial for endodontic treatment success.
- Conventional methods for smear layer removal can be challenging in complex root canal anatomy.
- Erbium lasers offer a potential alternative for root canal cleaning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of erbium lasers in removing smear layer from mesial roots of mandibular first molars.
- To compare the performance of two types of erbium lasers (Er, Cr: YSGG and erbium-doped YAG) at various settings.
- To assess the influence of irrigation protocols and laser power on smear layer removal.
Main Methods:
- One hundred mandibular first molars were used, with 96 mesial roots divided into experimental groups.
- Two laser wavelengths (Er, Cr: YSGG and erbium-doped YAG) were applied with different irrigation protocols and power settings.
- Samples were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for smear layer evaluation.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in smear layer removal was found between the two erbium laser types.
- Significant differences were observed between subgroups with different irrigation protocols (A vs. B) for both laser types.
- While groups IIA and IIB showed better outcomes in all root thirds, the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences were found among varying laser power subcategories.
Conclusions:
- The tested erbium laser parameters were insufficient for complete smear layer removal from root canals.
- Chelating agents may play a supportive role in enhancing laser-assisted smear layer removal, particularly in the apical portions of narrow and curved canals.

