Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

169
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
169
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

7.1K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
7.1K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

237
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
237
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.6K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.6K
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

530
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
530

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enteral Iron Supplementation.

Neonatal network : NN·2026
Same author

Ondansetron: A Novel Treatment to Reduce the Severity of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome?

Neonatal network : NN·2025
Same author

Second-Line Medications for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome/Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

Neonatal network : NN·2025
Same author

The Evidence-Based Practice Process Steps 4, 5, and 6: Integration, Evaluation, and Dissemination.

Neonatal network : NN·2024
Same author

Step 3: Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Expert Opinion.

Neonatal network : NN·2024
Same author

Step 3: Critically Appraising Evidence: Case-Control Studies.

Neonatal network : NN·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

690

Step 3, Critically Appraising Evidence: Quantitative Evidence-Randomized Controlled Trials.

Susan Givens Bell

    Neonatal Network : NN
    |July 15, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Critical appraisal is key in evidence-based practice. This article explains how to critically appraise randomized control trials, a vital step for healthcare professionals.

    Keywords:
    EBPevidence-based practicelevels of evidencequantitative evidencerandomized controlled trial

    More Related Videos

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
    06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    14.6K
    Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
    04:34

    Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

    Published on: February 17, 2023

    1.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Sep 4, 2025

    Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
    08:36

    Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

    Published on: April 19, 2024

    690
    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
    06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    14.6K
    Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
    04:34

    Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

    Published on: February 17, 2023

    1.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Evidence-based practice
    • Clinical research methodology
    • Health sciences

    Background:

    • Critical appraisal is the third step in evidence-based practice.
    • This is the third column in a series on critical appraisal.
    • Focuses on randomized control trials (RCTs).

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe the critical appraisal process for randomized control trials.
    • To provide guidance for healthcare professionals on evaluating research.
    • To enhance the application of evidence-based practice.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of critical appraisal principles specific to RCTs.
    • Discussion of common biases and methodological flaws in RCTs.
    • Guidance on interpreting results from randomized control trials.

    Main Results:

    • Understanding critical appraisal of RCTs is essential for evidence-based practice.
    • Methodological rigor of RCTs impacts the reliability of their findings.
    • Effective appraisal ensures appropriate application of research evidence.

    Conclusions:

    • Critical appraisal of randomized control trials is a fundamental skill.
    • This skill supports informed clinical decision-making.
    • Mastering appraisal enhances the quality of evidence-based healthcare.