Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Shared and distinct structure-function substrates of heterogenous distractor suppression ability between high and low
Ke Xie1, Zhenlan Jin1, Dong-Gang Jin1
1MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Center for Psychiatry and Psychology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Individuals with high working memory capacity (WMC) better suppress distracting stimuli. Brain structure and connectivity in attention networks differ between high- and low-WMC individuals, explaining this difference.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Salient stimuli capture attention bottom-up, but can be suppressed top-down.
- High working memory capacity (WMC) is linked to better suppression of salient, irrelevant distractors.
- Neural mechanisms underlying WMC-related differences in distractor suppression are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neuroanatomical differences associated with high versus low WMC in suppressing salient distractors.
- To explore the relationship between brain structure, functional connectivity, and distractor suppression performance across WMC groups.
Main Methods:
- Participants with high or low WMC performed a visual search task with a salient color singleton distractor.
- Structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were used.
- Voxel-based morphometry and functional connectivity analyses were conducted.
Main Results:
- High-WMC individuals showed superior distractor suppression, indicated by a larger reaction time benefit (ΔRT).
- Gray matter morphology in the ventral attention network (VAN) positively correlated with ΔRT in both groups.
- Gray matter morphology in the frontoparietal (FPN)/default mode network (DMN) showed opposite correlations with ΔRT between WMC groups.
- Connectivity between DMN and VAN hubs correlated with ΔRT in high-WMC individuals only.
Conclusions:
- Shared and distinct neuroanatomical substrates underlie distractor suppression in high- and low-WMC individuals.
- Intrinsic brain network connectivity, particularly in high-WMC individuals, may underlie their enhanced ability to suppress salient distractors.
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Information Processing Approach

