Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Using optimal foraging theory to infer how groups make collective decisions.
Grace H Davis1, Margaret C Crofoot2, Damien R Farine3
1Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancon, Panama; Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Department for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany; Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Understanding animal group decision-making is key to social processes. Linking individual choices to preferences using optimal foraging theory offers testable predictions for collective behavior studies.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Ecology
- Theoretical Ecology
- Social Behavior
Background:
- Collective animal behavior offers insights into social processes like coordination and decision-making.
- A significant challenge lies in connecting individual actions during group decisions to underlying preferences.
- Optimal foraging theory provides a framework for predicting individual preferences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To link optimal foraging theory, specifically the marginal value theorem (MVT), with collective animal behavior.
- To develop testable predictions for group decision-making based on individual foraging preferences.
- To facilitate the study of group decision-making across diverse species.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing optimal foraging theory and the marginal value theorem (MVT) to predict individual preferences.
- Comparing group behavior against MVT-derived predictions under various influence models.
- Developing a formal link between optimal foraging theory and collective behavior models.
Main Results:
- The study proposes a method to formally link optimal foraging theory to collective behavior.
- This approach generates easily testable predictions for group decision-making in natural settings.
- It enables the comparison of group actions with individual-level foraging theory predictions.
Conclusions:
- Formally linking optimal foraging theory to collective behavior provides a powerful, testable framework.
- This integration is crucial for understanding the ecological and evolutionary aspects of group decision-making.
- The approach opens new avenues for studying collective decision-making in a wide array of animal species.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Social Loafing
Reason and Intuition
Social Proof

