Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Study on the clinical features and prognosis of second and third generations of COVID-19
Chao Deng1, Liping Chen2, Chao Ji1
1Department of Critical Medicine, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital, Haikou, China.
Insights
Second and third generation coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients showed no significant differences in severity. However, third generation patients had higher creatine kinase and troponin levels initially, suggesting potential changes in viral virulence during transmission.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
Background:
- No prior studies compared clinical outcomes between second and third generation COVID-19 patients.
- Investigated differences in clinical manifestations and prognosis based on COVID-19 transmission generation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze epidemiological data and the correlation between clinical types and COVID-19 generations.
- To understand how viral evolution impacts disease presentation and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Adult COVID-19 patients were divided into second and third generation groups based on epidemiological history.
- Clinical characteristics, disease severity, and laboratory results were analyzed and compared using statistical tests (chi-square, t-test, Spearman correlation).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in gender, A-DROP scores, or BMI between generations.
- Third generation patients exhibited higher initial creatine kinase and troponin levels compared to the second generation.
- Age, duration, transmission generation, and specific laboratory markers (creatine kinase, troponin, CRP, procalcitonin, lymphocyte, and platelet counts) significantly correlated with clinical types.
Conclusions:
- Intergenerational transmission of COVID-19 may involve increased virulence in specific tissues.
- Clinical prognosis is closely linked to age, disease course, transmission generation, and certain laboratory indicators.
- Transmission generation, regional variations, and laboratory markers hold potential value for predicting prognosis and guiding treatment.
Background:
There have been no studies examining differences in clinical manifestations and prognosis between second and third generation coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Our object was to analyze the epidemiological data and correlation between clinical types and COVID-19 generations.
Methods:
Older than 18 years COVID-19 patients who met two of the three items listed in COVID-19 Diagnosis Protocol were enrolled and divided into two groups based on epidemiological history. Clinical characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, course), disease severity, laboratory results (platelets, white blood cells, lymphocytes, inflammatory biomarkers, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, myoglobin, troponin, D-dimer blood biochemical indexes), clinical types were analyzed. Two groups were compared by chi-square test, group means were compared by t test, correlation between COVID-19 generations and clinical severity and clinical types were examined by Spearman correlation analysis.
Results:
There were no significant differences in gender composition (P=0.488), A-DROP scores (P=0.079) nor BMI (P=0.532) between the two generations. The number of second generation patients over 60 years was significantly greater than that in third generation (P<0.001). Creatine kinase levels of third generation patients were significantly higher than those of second generation patients at admission (P=0.009) and during hospitalization (P=0.023). The troponin levels of third generation patients were significantly higher than those of second generation patients at admission (P=0.020). At discharged, the creatine kinase and troponin levels were not significantly different between the two generations. Rate of severe (P=0.130) and critical cases (P=0.314) in second generation COVID-19 patients was not significantly different from that of third generation patients. Age (ρ=0.224, P<0.001), duration (ρ=0.317, P<0.001), transmission generation (ρ=0.269, P<0.001), serum creatine kinase (ρ=0.240, P<0.001), troponin (ρ=0.296, P<0.001), C-reaction protein (ρ=0.278, P<0.001), procalcitonin levels (ρ=0.221, P=0.001), lymphocyte count (ρ=-0.245, P<0.001), and platelet count (ρ=-0.265, P<0.001) of COVID-19 patients were significantly s correlated with clinical types.
Conclusions:
Increased virulence may occur in specific tissues and organs during intergenerational transmission of COVID-19 virus. COVID-19 virus virulence in different regions is different. The clinical prognosis of COVID-19 patients is closely related to age, course, transmission generations, and some laboratory indicators. Transmission generation, regional differences, and laboratory indicators may have certain potential value in predicting prognosis and treatment.
More Related Videos
08:05Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
08:41Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection in K18 hACE2 Transgenic Mice Using Reporter-Expressing Recombinant SARS-CoV-2
Published on: November 5, 2021
Related Concept Videos
COPD: Pathogenesis and Clinical Features
The primary cause for the onset of COPD is cigarette smoking and exposure to air pollution. These hazardous factors initiate a chain reaction within the lungs, resulting in chronic inflammation, damage to the airways, and a...
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Stages of Infection
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-III: Symptoms and Complications.
Symptoms of COPD can be classified as primary or systemic. Primary symptoms relate to reduced airflow, while systemic or extrapulmonary symptoms relate to COPD's broader impact on the body.
Primary Symptoms of COPD: