Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

09:01
The Bovine Lung in Biomedical Research: Visually Guided Bronchoscopy, Intrabronchial Inoculation and In Vivo Sampling Techniques
Published on: July 3, 2014
23.3K
Using Canine Olfaction to Detect Bovine Respiratory Disease: A Pilot Study
Aiden E Juge1, Nathaniel J Hall2, John T Richeson3
1Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
|July 18, 2022
Summary
Trained dogs showed moderate success in identifying bovine respiratory disease (BRD) using nasal swabs. Further research is needed to determine if canine scent detection can be a viable BRD screening method for cattle.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Animal Science
- Olfactory Detection
Background:
- Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a significant cause of illness and death in feedlot cattle, posing economic and welfare challenges.
- Current methods for identifying BRD-affected cattle are often limited by accuracy, speed, and cost.
- Canine olfaction offers a potential avenue for disease detection, as dogs can differentiate scent profiles of diseased and healthy individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of trained dogs in detecting bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in cattle using nasal swabs.
- To assess the accuracy of canine scent detection as a potential diagnostic tool for BRD in feedlot settings.
Main Methods:
- Two dogs were trained for seven months to discriminate between nasal swabs from BRD-affected and healthy cattle.
- Dogs were trained using positive reinforcement, identifying positive samples from sets of one positive and two negative swabs.
- A double-blind detection test was conducted on 123 unique nasal swab samples, with handlers and data recorders blinded to sample status.
Main Results:
- During training, dogs achieved accuracies of 0.817 (Runnels) and 0.647 (Cheaps), exceeding chance (0.333).
- In the double-blind test, overall accuracy was 0.421, with slightly better-than-chance results for one dog (Cheaps: 0.451).
- When using a consensus response from both dogs, accuracy improved to 0.537, though detection varied by sample lot.
Conclusions:
- Dogs demonstrated some ability to discriminate between BRD-affected and healthy cattle via nasal swab scent.
- The complexity of the task and variable accuracy suggest that further research is required.
- Canine scent detection may require additional refinement before it can be considered a reliable screening method for BRD in feedlots.

