Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Indirect COVID-19 health effects and potential mitigating interventions: Cost-effectiveness framework.
Sigal Maya1, James G Kahn1,2, Tracy K Lin3
1Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant indirect health harms, including depression and substance abuse, leading to substantial societal costs. Implementing mitigation strategies can effectively reduce these health burdens and economic losses.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in substantial indirect health and social harms beyond direct SARS-CoV-2 infection impacts.
- These indirect effects, including increased depression and substance abuse, can have lasting life-course consequences.
- Estimating the health and economic outcomes of these conditions and their mitigation is crucial for public health policy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a cost-effectiveness framework for evaluating societal costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost due to indirect COVID-19 health effects in California.
- To assess short- and long-term outcomes for the adult population.
- To identify evidence-based mitigation strategies and estimate their impact on QALYs gained, intervention costs, and averted harms.
Main Methods:
- A cost-effectiveness framework was developed to analyze six indirect health effects of COVID-19.
- Societal costs and QALYs lost were evaluated for the adult population in California.
- Data were sourced from literature reviews, public data, and expert opinions to estimate outcomes and mitigation impacts.
Main Results:
- Indirect COVID-19 effects were estimated to cause over 192,000 QALYs lost and nearly $7 billion in societal costs per million adults over the life course.
- Adult depression represented the largest contributor to costs and QALYs lost.
- All assessed mitigation strategies demonstrated cost and QALY savings, with five achieving savings within one year. Addressing depression and excessive alcohol use offered the greatest 10-year net savings.
Conclusions:
- The COVID-19 pandemic imposes significant human suffering and societal costs through its indirect health effects.
- Policymakers can mitigate these societal costs and health harms by implementing targeted public health interventions.
- Investing in strategies to address conditions like depression and substance abuse is economically beneficial and improves population health outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:36Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Preventive Healthcare Services