Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

959
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
959

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harmonization of measurement units: mission impossible or ethical imperative?

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

The value-based score in laboratory medicine: results of a European pilot study.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Characterizing variation in laboratory medicine data: a comparative analysis of standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Lot-to-lot variability of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: clinical implications.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

The complete blood count: data or clinical information?

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

EFLM position statement on the proposed 2025/0404(COD) IVDR Amendment of Article 5.5.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Fish-shaped erythrocytes and pincer cells co-occur in distinct hematological disorders and are associated with anemia severity.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Artificial general intelligence and the clinical laboratory: a paradigm shift toward Lab 2.0.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Addressing property and unit discordance in laboratory interoperability: the role of NPU as a governance layer.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Ethical evaluation of reflex and reflective testing in conformity with ISO 15189:2022 at the value-based laboratory medicine era.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Emerging blood-based diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Homocitrulline and 3-year mortality in older hospitalised adults: an exploratory study.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K

Traceable machine learning real-time quality control based on patient data.

Rui Zhou1,2, Wei Wang3, Andrea Padoan4

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
|July 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new machine learning internal quality control (MLiQC) method demonstrates superior performance compared to patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC). MLiQC is well-suited for clinical settings, offering enhanced accuracy and faster bias detection in laboratory testing.

Keywords:
algorithm traceabilitylaboratorypatient datareal-time quality controlsupervised machine learning

More Related Videos

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.5K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.5K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Metrology and Quality Control

Background:

  • Patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) is an emerging tool for internal quality control (iQC) in clinical laboratories.
  • Concerns regarding PBRTQC's performance and real-world clinical applicability persist.
  • There is a need for robust, accessible, and validated real-time QC methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an easily accessible patient-based real-time QC method using machine learning (ML).
  • To ensure the ML-based QC is traceable to standard reference data from the National Institute of Metrology of China (NIM).
  • To compare the performance of the novel ML-based QC with existing PBRTQC methods for clinical validity.

Main Methods:

  • Collected over 1.195 million patient testing results for five representative biochemistry analytes.
  • Developed a machine learning internal quality control (MLiQC) model using the Random Forest algorithm.
  • Validated MLiQC through metrological traceability to NIM reference data and comparison with four IFCC-recommended PBRTQC methods.

Main Results:

  • MLiQC demonstrated low uncertainty (0.14% for albumin) when evaluated against NIM standard reference data.
  • MLiQC significantly reduced the average number of patient samples needed for bias detection (ANPed) from 600 to 20 compared to PBRTQC.
  • MLiQC outperformed all tested PBRTQC methods in median and 95% quantile of sample detection (MNPed and 95NPed) for over 90% of analytes.

Conclusions:

  • MLiQC offers superior performance and is highly suitable for real-world clinical laboratory settings.
  • The validation confirms MLiQC's satisfactory performance through both algorithmic traceability and clinical effectiveness.
  • This ML-driven approach represents a significant advancement in laboratory quality control.