Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

04:19
A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
4.0K
Rigor and reproducibility for data analysis and design in the study of eating disorders.
Annabel Susanin1, Allison Boyar1, Kayla Costello1
1Eating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
The International Journal of Eating Disorders
|July 19, 2022
Summary
Open science practices increased rigor and reproducibility in eating disorder research after 2016. However, adopting these methods did not significantly boost article citation impact, suggesting limited researcher incentive.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
- Research Methodology
- Scientific Publishing
Background:
- Open science practices are increasingly prioritized for journal submissions, aiming to enhance research rigor and reproducibility.
- Statistical controversies can undermine the reliability of published findings.
- The International Journal of Eating Disorders (IJED) has focused on incorporating open science principles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the implementation of open science principles in the IJED using the rigor and reproducibility framework.
- To determine if adopting open science practices influences research citation rates.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of 1145 articles published in IJED from 2011 to 2021.
- Coding for 10 specific open science elements, including preregistration, data sharing, and code availability.
- Analysis of citation metrics in relation to the presence of open science criteria.
Main Results:
- A significant positive trend in total rigor and reproducibility (Total RR) criteria was observed after the introduction of preregistration in 2016.
- Total RR criteria decreased by 0.14 per year from 2011-2016 but increased by 0.42 per volume from 2016-2021.
- No statistically significant relationship was found between Total RR criteria and article citation impact.
Conclusions:
- While statistical rigor and reproducibility have improved in eating disorder research, the lack of increased citation impact suggests insufficient incentives for researchers to adopt open science guidelines.
- Further investigation is needed to understand the barriers and facilitators for implementing open science practices effectively.
Related Concept Videos
Anorexia Nervosa
183
Anorexia nervosa is a complex and severe eating disorder characterized by an intense fear of weight gain, an unrelenting pursuit of thinness, and a distorted body image. It often leads to dangerously low body weight relative to an individual's age and height. This disorder is marked by significant physical and psychological consequences, making it one of the most life-threatening psychiatric illnesses.
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
183
Binge Eating Disorders
164
Binge eating disorder is a significant mental health condition characterized by recurrent episodes of excessive food consumption within a short period, accompanied by a perceived loss of control over eating behavior. Unlike occasional overeating, binge eating disorder is marked by distressing emotions such as guilt, shame, and anxiety following binge episodes. The disorder affects individuals across different ages and backgrounds, with profound implications for physical and psychological...
164
Bulimia Nervosa
188
Bulimia nervosa is a complex and severe eating disorder characterized by a cyclical pattern of binge-and-purge eating pattern. It generally involves an episode of binge eating, followed by compensatory behaviors such as vomiting, excessive exercise, laxative use, or fasting, to prevent weight gain. Despite often maintaining a normal weight, individuals with bulimia are intensely preoccupied with their body image and harbor an overwhelming fear of gaining weight. This can contribute to the...
188
Regression Toward the Mean
6.5K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.5K
Group Design
9.5K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
593
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
593

