Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Robust min-max regret covering problems
Amadeu A Coco1, Andréa Cynthia Santos1, Thiago F Noronha2
1UNIHAVRE, UNIROUEN, INSA Rouen, LITIS, Normandie Université, Le Havre, France.
Abstract:
This article deals with two min-max regret covering problems: the min-max regret Weighted Set Covering Problem (min-max regret WSCP) and the min-max regret Maximum Benefit Set Covering Problem (min-max regret MSCP). These problems are the robust optimization counterparts, respectively, of the Weighted Set Covering Problem and of the Maximum Benefit Set Covering Problem. In both problems, uncertainty in data is modeled by using an interval of continuous values, representing all the infinite values every uncertain parameter can assume. This study has the following major contributions: (i) a proof that MSCP is -Hard, (ii) a mathematical formulation for the min-max regret MSCP, (iii) exact and (iv) heuristic algorithms for the min-max regret WSCP and the min-max regret MSCP. We reproduce the main exact algorithms for the min-max regret WSCP found in the literature: a Logic-based Benders decomposition, an extended Benders decomposition and a branch-and-cut. In addition, such algorithms have been adapted for the min-max regret MSCP. Moreover, five heuristics are applied for both problems: two scenario-based heuristics, a path relinking, a pilot method and a linear programming-based heuristic. The goal is to analyze the impact of such methods on handling robust covering problems in terms of solution quality and performance.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Margin of Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...