Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Accuracy of two dosimetry software programs for 177Lu radiopharmaceutical therapy using voxel-based patient-specific
Keamogetswe Ramonaheng1, Johannes A van Staden1, Hanlie du Raan1
1Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.
Purpose:
Virtual dosimetry using voxel-based patient-specific phantoms and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations offer the advantage of having a gold standard against which absorbed doses may be benchmarked to establish the dosimetry accuracy. Furthermore, these reference values assist in investigating the accuracy of the absorbed dose methodologies from different software programs. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the accuracy of the absorbed doses computed using LundADose and OLINDA/EXM 1.0.
Methods:
The accuracy was based on 177Lu-DOTATATE distributions of three voxel-based phantoms. SPECT projection images were simulated for 1, 24, 96, and 168 h post-administration and reconstructed with LundADose using 3D OS-EM reconstruction. Mono-exponential curves were fitted to the bio-kinetic data for the kidneys, liver, spleen, and tumours resulting in SPECT time-integrated activity (SPECT-TIA). The SPECT-TIA were used to compute mean absorbed doses using LundADose (LND-DSPECT) and OLINDA (OLINDA-DSPECT) for the organs. Pre-defined true activity images, were used to obtain TRUE-TIA and, together with full MC simulations, computed the true doses (MC-DTrue). The dosimetry accuracy was assessed by comparing LND-DSPECT and OLINDA-DSPECT to MC-DTrue.
Results:
Overall, the results presented an overestimation of the mean absorbed dose by LND-DSPECT compared to the MC-DTrue with a dosimetry accuracy ≤6.6%. This was attributed to spill-out activity from the reconstructed LND-DSPECT, resulting in a higher dose contribution than the MC-DTrue. There was a general underestimation (<8.1%) of OLINDA-DSPECT compared to MC-DTrue attributed to the geometrical difference in shape between the voxel-based phantoms and the OLINDA models. Furthermore, OLINDA-DSPECT considers self-doses while MC-DTrue reflects self-doses plus cross-doses.
Conclusion:
The better than 10% accuracy suggests that the mean dose values obtained with LND-DSPECT and OLINDA-DSPECT approximate the true values. The mean absorbed doses of the two software programs, and the gold standard were comparable. This work shall be of use for optimising 177Lu dosimetry for clinical applications.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021