Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025
04:58
Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
2.3K
Validation of the national Danish ablation database: a retrospective, registry-based validation study
Filip Lyng Lindgren1, Sofie Brix Christensen1, Søren Lundbye-Christensen2,3
1Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal : SCJ
|July 22, 2022
Summary
The National Danish Ablation Database (NDAD) shows high validity, with its data closely matching patient medical records for atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. This registry ensures reliable information for research and clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The National Danish Ablation Database (NDAD) collects data on atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures.
- Validating registry data against medical records is crucial for ensuring data accuracy and reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the National Danish Ablation Database (NDAD) by comparing its data against comprehensive patient medical records.
- To assess the extent of agreement between NDAD entries and gold-standard medical records for AF ablation.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective validation study design was employed.
- Data from 597 patients undergoing AF ablation in Denmark (2016) were analyzed.
- Positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for NDAD data against medical records.
Main Results:
- Median PPV and NPV for NDAD data were high, at 90.4% and 99.4% at baseline, and 91.7% and 99.3% at follow-up.
- High agreement (>90%) was observed across key categories: arrhythmia characteristics, demographics, cardiac history, and medication.
- Slightly greater uncertainty in PPV/NPV estimates was noted for complication variables due to their low incidence.
Conclusions:
- The NDAD demonstrates high data validity, aligning well with patient medical records.
- The findings support the reliability of NDAD for research and clinical quality assessment in AF ablation.
- While generally robust, specific data points like rare complications may require careful interpretation due to inherent statistical variability.
