Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

08:06
Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy
Published on: January 31, 2025
394
Alternative Randomized Trial Designs in Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Simone Augustinus1,2, Iris W J M van Goor3,4, Johannes Berkhof5
1Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annals of Surgery
|July 22, 2022
Summary
Alternative randomized controlled trial (RCT) designs are increasingly used in surgical research to overcome common challenges. These methods, including stepped-wedge, registry-based, and trials-within-cohorts, show a significant rise in adoption.
Area of Science:
- Surgical research methodology
- Clinical trial design
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evidence but face significant challenges in surgical settings, including slow patient accrual and the surgical learning curve.
- Alternative RCT designs offer potential solutions to these inherent difficulties in surgical research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of alternative randomized controlled trial designs utilized in surgical research.
- To assess the trends and reasons for adopting these alternative designs in surgery.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central for surgical stepped-wedge RCTs (SW-RCTs), registry-based RCTs (RB-RCTs), and trials-within-cohorts (TwiCs).
- Definition of a surgical RCT included interventions in general surgery patients.
- Exponential regression analysis was used to evaluate time trends in the adoption of these designs.
Main Results:
- A total of 41 surgical RCTs employing alternative designs were identified (17 reports, 24 protocols).
- Stepped-wedge RCTs (SW-RCTs) were the most common (61%), followed by registry-based RCTs (RB-RCTs) (32%) and trials-within-cohorts (TwiCs) (7%).
- The use of these alternative designs has increased exponentially over the past seven years, with 95% of identified trials published within this period, primarily in Europe and gastrointestinal/oncological surgery.
Conclusions:
- Alternative RCT designs are increasingly adopted in surgical research, particularly in Europe and gastrointestinal/oncological surgery.
- These designs, when appropriately implemented, can effectively address common obstacles encountered in traditional surgical RCTs.
- The growing trend suggests these methods are valuable for advancing surgical evidence generation.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Crossover Experiments
2.9K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.9K
Blinding
2.6K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.6K
Experimental Designs
11.8K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.8K
Study Designs in Epidemiology
387
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
387
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
274
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
274

