Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Radial access for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry
Bahadir Simsek1, Sevket Gorgulu2, Spyridon Kostantinis1
1Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Insights
Radial access for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used. This approach showed fewer access site complications with similar success rates and major adverse cardiovascular events compared to femoral access.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access
Background:
- Radial access is gaining popularity for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic total occlusion (CTO).
- Understanding the clinical and procedural outcomes of radial versus femoral access in CTO PCI is crucial for optimizing patient care.
- The Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO) provides valuable data on this topic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of CTO PCI using radial versus femoral access.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of radial access in CTO PCI.
- To identify factors influencing the choice of access site in CTO PCI procedures.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the PROGRESS-CTO registry (NCT02061436) including 10,954 patients undergoing CTO PCI.
- Comparison of patient demographics, comorbidities, and angiographic complexity between radial-only and femoral access groups.
- Statistical analysis, including adjusted odds ratios, to evaluate access site complications, technical success, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Main Results:
- Radial-only access was utilized in 24% of CTO PCI cases.
- Patients undergoing radial-only access were younger, more likely male, and had fewer comorbidities.
- Radial-only access was associated with significantly lower access site complications (OR: 0.45) but similar technical success (OR: 0.87) and MACE (OR: 0.65) compared to femoral access, after adjusting for confounders.
Conclusions:
- Radial access is a safe and effective alternative to femoral access for CTO PCI.
- The use of radial access in CTO PCI is associated with reduced access site complications without compromising procedural success or major adverse cardiovascular events.
- Radial access should be considered a primary approach for CTO PCI, particularly in carefully selected patient populations.
Abstract:
Use of radial access for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasing. We examined the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients who underwent CTO PCI with radial versus femoral access in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436). Of 10,954 patients who underwent CTO PCI at 55 centers in 7 countries between 2012 and 2022, 2578 (24%) had a radial only approach. Patients who underwent radial only access were younger (63 ± 10 vs. 65 ± 10, years, p < 0.001), more likely to be men (84% vs. 81%, p = 0.001), and had significantly lower prevalence of comorbidities compared with the femoral access group including diabetes mellitus (39% vs. 45%, p < 0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (57% vs. 64%, p < 0.001). In addition, radial only cases had lower angiographic complexity with lower J-CTO and PROGRESS-CTO scores. After adjusting for potential confounders, radial only access was associated with lower risk of access site complications (odds ratio [OR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.91), similar technical success (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74-1.04) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.40-1.07), compared with the femoral access group. Radial only access was used in 24% of CTO PCIs and was associated with lower access site complications, and similar technical success and MACE as compared with the femoral access group.
More Related Videos
06:02Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization