Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
Acute infusion effects in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients receiving alemtuzumab under a modified prophylaxis
Richard Leckey1, Liborio Borsellino2, Andreea M Rawlings3
1Maritime Neurology, 349 Herring Cove Road, Herring Cove, Halifax, NS B3R 1V9, Canada; Division of Neurology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Background:
Use of alemtuzumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is limited by safety concerns, notably risk of rare, serious vascular events. Along with other vital sign (VS) changes, acute increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) is monitored as a marker of vascular risk. Peri-infusion prophylaxis is used to manage clinical risk by moderating cytokine release; protocols are not fully specified and vary across sites. Here, we report a modified prophylaxis regimen developed at Maritime Neurology. This single-center observational cohort study (NCT04633967) aimed to examine acute responses (VS events and infusion-associated reactions) in RMS patients receiving alemtuzumab infusion under this regimen. In a post hoc analysis, we examined incidence of acute SBP increase at this clinic versus the Bayshore network of Canadian infusion centers, where a standard prophylaxis regimen is used.
Methods:
Alemtuzumab was infused on 5 consecutive days (Course 1; n = 29) and 3 consecutive days one year later (Course 2; n = 28). In addition to intravenous methylprednisolone 500mg on each infusion day, patients received daily prophylactic treatment with oral prednisone 50mg from 5 days before to 5 days after treatment (infusion days excepted) and oral H1 and H2 antihistaminics from 7 days before to 7 days after treatment. Excursions in SBP and other VS were relative to prespecified ranges; persistent excursions were those for which two sequential measurements were outside these ranges. In comparing VS events at Maritime Neurology and the Bayshore centers, acute SBP increase was defined as ≥20 mmHg increase in mean SBP, or any SBP reading ≥20% over patient's pre-course baseline.
Results:
Mean (SD) VS were within range at pre-course and all other daily baselines. VS changes, including persistent excursions, were generally subclinical; all infusion-associated reactions were mild. One patient discontinued treatment after Course 1 due to immune thrombocytopenia purpura. Acute SBP increase occurred in 11/28 (39%) Maritime Neurology versus 367/610 (60%) Bayshore (p = 0.028).
Conclusion:
The modified peri-infusion prophylaxis regimen was well tolerated and may reduce incidence of acute SBP increase.
Funding:
This project was funded by Sanofi, Canada.
More Related Videos
06:08Assessment of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Associated Toxicities Using an Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Model
Published on: February 10, 2023
05:55Author Spotlight: Novel Assay for Studying B-Cell Responses in Multiple Sclerosis Research
Published on: December 1, 2023