An Analysis of 50 Consecutive Total Ankle Replacements Undergoing Preoperative Computerized Tomography Scan-Based,...

Preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scan-based, engineer-provided alignment plans and patient-specific pinning blocks for total ankle replacement (TAR) are available for use in the United States. However, nonbiased studies that justify the additional expense associated with this technology through support of the marketed benefits of less procedural complexity, less intraoperative radiation and reduced surgical time, are lacking. Therefore, to verify the manufacturer's proposed benefits, we sought to investigate our experience with this preoperative CT scan-based, engineer-provided plan and patient-specific pinning blocks during primary TAR. In review of our 50 TAR patients, we found that "perfect" radiographic alignment was not consistently achieved and the accuracy of component prediction was modest. Furthermore, the preoperative plans and patient-specific pinning blocks did not simplify the complexity of our operations since the operative time, intraoperative image intensification time and radiation dose per case all exceeded published historical TAR controls. Interestingly, we identified a significant difference in placement accuracy between the arced and flat-top talar component types that were implanted with the arced being more frequently malaligned. We did not find associations between preoperative deformity severity and accuracy of postoperative alignment. These findings suggest that it is imperative to have surgeons continue to rely on their own surgical planning and experience to achieve optimum radiographic alignment rather than depending on engineer-based recommendations or "surface matched" pinning blocks. Ultimately, we were unable to support the purported benefits of this CT scan-based, engineer-provided alignment plan and patient-specific pinning blocks for this manufacturer's primary TAR systems.