Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.8K
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

6.1K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
6.1K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.9K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

242
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
242
Prosopagnosia01:24

Prosopagnosia

244
Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...
244
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

General scales unlock AI evaluation with explanatory and predictive power.

Nature·2026
Same author

Effect of strengths-based care: community led support.

European journal of ageing·2025
Same author

Avatars versus the people: Photo-realism, spontaneous detection and trait inferences of digitised faces.

Perception·2025
Same author

A criterion-placement theory of face matching.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Neural correlates of the uncanny valley effect for robots and hyper-realistic masks.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Association Between Digital Front Doors and Social Care Use for Community-Dwelling Adults in England: Cross-Sectional Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same journal

Time poverty increases self-dehumanization through undermining belief in free will.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Temporal dynamics of induced mood and its relationship with modality and individual trait.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Less is more when time is scarce: How time poverty enhances minimalistic consumption through increased need for order.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Time poverty and access-based consumption: Convenience gains and risk blindness.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Contextual cues do not facilitate spontaneous face recognition.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
Same journal

Coping by deceiving: Developing LYin self-perceived self-deception scales and exploring their links to interpersonal deception.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

9.6K

Ingroup and outgroup differences in face detection.

Jonathan E Prunty1, Rob Jenkins2, Rana Qarooni2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
|July 25, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans detect faces from their own social groups faster and more accurately than outgroup faces. This ingroup bias in face detection is independent of color and reflects social experience.

Keywords:
colourface detectiongroup processingingroup biasother-race effecttemplate-matching

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.5K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

9.6K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.5K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Humans exhibit an 'ingroup bias,' showing better recognition for familiar social group members.
  • This bias is well-documented in face recognition but its presence in earlier visual processing stages remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the ingroup bias extends to the initial stage of face detection.
  • To determine if face detection shows preferential processing for ingroup versus outgroup faces.

Main Methods:

  • Participants' ability to detect ingroup (Black, White) and outgroup (Asian, Black, White) faces in natural scenes was measured.
  • Experiments manipulated face hue and employed a computational model to replicate human detection patterns.

Main Results:

  • Ingroup faces were detected significantly faster and more accurately than outgroup faces.
  • This ingroup advantage persisted even when face hue information was removed.
  • A computational model mirrored these findings, suggesting a template-based mechanism.

Conclusions:

  • The ingroup bias in face processing begins at the earliest stage of visual detection.
  • This effect is 'color-blind,' independent of hue, and influenced by social experience.
  • Face detection is a complex phenomenon influenced by both visual and social factors.