Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025
Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Published on: June 6, 2025
Does the asymmetry and extension function of the preoperative cervical paraspinal extensor predict postoperative
Sibo Lin1, Taotao Lin1, Zhengru Wu1
1Department of Orthopedics, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Xinquan Road No.29, Gulou, Fuzhou 086-350001, China.
Background Context:
A previous study found that the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the preoperative cervical paraspinal extensors (CPEs) was associated with loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty, while a recent study found that CPE asymmetry was associated with symptoms of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Whether preoperative CPE asymmetry can predict cervical sagittal deformity (CSD) after laminoplasty is unknown.
Purpose:
To assess whether asymmetry, degree of degeneration, and extension function of the CPE can be used as predictors of postoperative CSD in patients who undergo laminoplasty.
Study Design:
A retrospective study.
Patient Sample:
From January 2017 to December 2019, 55 patients with multilevel cord compression and myelopathic symptoms were enrolled.
Outcome Measures:
The visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) were used to assess cervical spinal function and quality of life.
Methods:
From January 2017 to December 2019, 55 patients undergoing modified laminoplasty were included. The following parameters were measured preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively on X-ray: (1) C0-C2 Cobb angle; (2) C2-C7 Cobb angle (CL); (3) T1 slope (T1S); (5) C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA); (6) T1S minus CL; (7) Preoperative extension function: Extension CL minus Neutral CL (EF). Preoperative global alignment parameters: (8) spino cranial angle, (9) C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (C7 SVA), (10) pelvic incidence, (11) lumbar lordosis, (12) thoracic kyphosis. (13) Preoperative CPE parameters: Summation of bilateral total cross-sectional area (STCSA), summation of bilateral total cross-sectional area ratio (STCSAR), total cross-sectional area asymmetry, summation of bilateral functional cross-sectional area of muscle (SFCSA), summation of bilateral functional cross-sectional area of muscle ratio (FCSAR), and functional cross-sectional area of muscle asymmetry (FCSAA). The VAS, mJOA, and NDI were used to evaluate cervical spine function and quality of life. Patients were divided into the CSD group and the non-deformed group (N-CSD) group postoperatively, and the parameters between the two groups were compared. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the parameters, and multiple regression analysis and ROC curve analysis were used to determine the predictors and key values.
Results:
Compared with functional scores, mJOA in the CSD group was significantly lower than that in the N-CSD group, while NDI and VAS were significantly higher. Postoperative CL was significantly correlated with EF, SFCSA/STCSA (C3-C6), SFCSAR (C4 and C6), STCSAR (C6), and FSCAA (C6). T1S minus CL was significantly correlated with EF, SFCSA/STCSA (C3-4 and C6), SFCSAR (C4 and C6), STCSAR (C6) and FSCAA (C6). C2-7 SVA was significantly correlated with EF, SFCSAR (C4 and C6), STCSAR (C6), and FSCAA (C6). Multiple regression analysis showed that FCSAA (C6), SFCSAR (C6), SFCSAR (C4), and EF were significant predictors of postoperative CSD. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff points were 18.405, 2.95, 4.47, and 11.96.
Conclusions:
The present study found that preoperative extension dysfunction of CPEs, asymmetry at the C6 level cervical extensors, and cervical extensor CSAs without fatty infiltration at the C4 and C6 levels were associated with cervical sagittal imbalance after modified laminoplasty. These factors can be considered when future spine surgeons formulate surgical plans.
