Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Deep Neural Networks for Image-Based Dietary Assessment
Published on: March 13, 2021
Unboxing Deep Learning Model of Food Delivery Service Reviews Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Anirban Adak1, Biswajeet Pradhan1,2, Nagesh Shukla1
1Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), Faculty of Engineering & IT, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
This study applied deep learning (DL) and explainable AI (XAI) to analyze food delivery service (FDS) customer reviews. The LSTM model excelled in identifying customer complaints, offering valuable insights for service improvement.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence
- Natural Language Processing
- Customer Service Analytics
Background:
- The surge in food delivery services (FDSs) during COVID-19 generated vast amounts of customer feedback.
- Analyzing this feedback manually is resource-intensive, hindering FDSs' ability to address customer concerns effectively.
- Deep learning (DL) offers potential for automated analysis, but its 'black box' nature requires explainability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of various DL models for sentiment analysis in the FDS domain.
- To utilize explainable AI (XAI) techniques to interpret DL model predictions and identify key sentiment drivers.
- To select an optimal DL model for FDSs prioritizing the accurate identification of customer complaints.
Main Methods:
- Sentiment analysis was performed using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and a hybrid Bi-GRU-LSTM-CNN model.
- Models were trained and tested on customer reviews from the ProductReview website.
- Explainable AI (XAI) methods, specifically SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), were employed for model interpretability.
Main Results:
- The DL models achieved high accuracy: LSTM (96.07%), Bi-LSTM (95.85%), and Bi-GRU-LSTM-CNN (96.33%).
- The LSTM model demonstrated the lowest rate of false negatives, crucial for FDSs aiming to address all customer complaints.
- XAI techniques successfully identified word-level contributions to sentiment, validating the models' predictions.
Conclusions:
- The LSTM model is a suitable choice for FDS sentiment analysis due to its high accuracy and low false negative rate.
- Integrating XAI with DL models enhances transparency and provides actionable insights for improving FDS customer satisfaction.
- This approach enables FDS organizations to efficiently process customer feedback and drive service enhancements.
More Related Videos
06:19Integration of Animal Behavioral Assessment and Convolutional Neural Network to Study Wasabi-Alcohol Taste-Smell Interaction
Published on: August 16, 2024
05:41A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
Published on: February 6, 2020