Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

10:23
Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
3.0K
New Sagittal and Vertical Cephalometric Analysis Methods: A Systematic Review
Jacek Kotuła1, Anna Ewa Kuc2, Joanna Lis1
1Department of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 27, 2022
Summary
This systematic review evaluates new cephalometric analyses for orthodontic diagnosis. It assesses novel measurements for jaw base discrepancies, aiming to improve precision and reliability in treatment planning.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics and Dental Imaging
- Craniomaxillofacial Analysis
Background:
- Cephalometric analysis is crucial for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, focusing on jaw base discrepancies.
- Existing cephalometric measurements may lack satisfactory accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility.
- New cephalometric analyses are continuously developed to enhance diagnostic precision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review new 2D cephalometric landmarks and measurements for assessing sagittal and vertical jaw base discrepancies since 2013.
- To evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and stability of novel cephalometric analyses compared to traditional methods.
- To critically assess the scientific literature for improved diagnostic tools in orthodontics.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Pro Quest.
- Keywords focused on new cephalometric analyses, landmarks, and measurements for jaw base discrepancies.
- Initial retrieval of 1451 articles, followed by duplicate exclusion and criteria-based selection.
Main Results:
- Only 12 studies on new sagittal cephalometric analyses and 4 on new horizontal cephalometric analyses met the inclusion criteria.
- The review identified a limited number of studies focusing on novel cephalometric analyses published since the last systematic review.
- The selected studies aimed to improve the precision of measurements for anteroposterior and vertical jaw discrepancies.
Conclusions:
- A significant number of new cephalometric analyses have been proposed, but few meet rigorous scientific evaluation criteria.
- Further research is needed to validate the accuracy and reliability of novel cephalometric measurements for clinical application.
- The development of precise and reproducible cephalometric tools remains a key objective in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

