Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Insertion, Maintenance, and Removal of the Percutaneous Dual Lumen Cannula Right Ventricular Assist Device
Published on: July 20, 2022
Safety and Feasibility Assessment of Repetitive Vascular Occlusion Stimulus (RVOS) Application to Multi-Organ Failure
Ismita Chhetri1,2,3, Julie E A Hunt2, Jeewaka R Mendis2
1Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK.
Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) shows potential safety and acceptability for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, despite recruitment challenges. Further modifications are needed to enhance tolerability and explore clinical benefits in preventing muscle wasting.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Muscle Physiology
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) affects 40% of patients, leading to long-term physical disability.
- Muscle wasting is a key factor in ICU-AW pathogenesis.
- Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) has shown promise in limiting muscle atrophy in other patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the safety, tolerability, feasibility, and acceptability of RVOS in adult multi-organ failure patients.
- To assess the exploratory outcomes of RVOS on muscle mass, clinical status, and blood biomarkers.
- To determine if RVOS can mitigate muscle wasting in the intensive care unit setting.
Main Methods:
- Adult multi-organ failure patients received standard care with or without twice-daily RVOS for 10 days.
- RVOS involved 4 cycles of 5-minute tourniquet inflation (50 mmHg supra-systolic) and 5-minute deflation.
- Outcomes included serious adverse events (SAEs), tolerability, rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RFCSA), echogenicity, clinical scores (SOFA), and blood biomarkers (IGF-1, syndecan-1, IL-4, TNF-RII).
Main Results:
- Recruitment was challenging, with only 12 of 32 participants enrolled; 76.1% of RVOS sessions were delivered to 5 participants, and 2 could not tolerate it.
- No SAEs were reported; RVOS was deemed acceptable by 75% of participants and 82% of staff.
- Both control and intervention groups showed significant decreases in RFCSA and increased echogenicity.
- The intervention group exhibited fewer cases of acute kidney injury (AKI), a greater decrease in SOFA score, increased IGF-1, and reduced syndecan-1, IL-4, and TNF-RII.
Conclusions:
- RVOS application in ICU patients appears safe and acceptable, but requires protocol modifications to improve tolerability and recruitment.
- Preliminary data suggest potential clinical benefits of RVOS in mitigating muscle wasting and improving outcomes in ICU patients.
- Further research with optimized protocols is warranted to confirm the efficacy of RVOS for ICU-AW prevention.
More Related Videos
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019