Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region01:03

IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region

1.1K
IR spectra are divided into two main regions: the diagnostic region and the fingerprint region. The diagnostic region of the spectrum lies above 1500 cm−1. The absorptions resulting from single-bond vibrations of the N–H, C–H, and O–H stretch at higher wavenumbers and appear on the left side of the spectrum. The stretching absorptions of the C≡C and C≡N occur between 2100–2300 cm−1. In contrast, those arising from stretching absorptions of the...
1.1K
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

322
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
322
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

146
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence...
146
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unfolded RPCA Network for Mitigating Inter-Transmitter Code Interference in MIMO PMCW Systems.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Assessment of Freshwater Unionidae Using Environmental DNA Metabarcoding in Lentic Ecosystems: Implications for Spatial Sampling Strategies.

Biology·2026
Same author

Environmental DNA to track endangered Gobiobotia naktongensis: Assessment of distribution and habitat requirements.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

DNN-Based Estimation for Misalignment State of Automotive Radar Sensor.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

FPGA Implementation of the Chirp-Scaling Algorithm for Real-Time Synthetic Aperture Radar Imaging.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

A broadband ultraviolet light source using GaN quantum dots formed on hexagonal truncated pyramid structures.

Nanoscale advances·2022
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

7.9K

Autoencoder-Based Target Detection in Automotive MIMO FMCW Radar System.

Sung-Wook Kang1, Min-Ho Jang1, Seongwook Lee1

  • 1School of Electronics and Information Engineering, College of Engineering, Korea Aerospace University, Goyang 10540, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 28, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A novel convolutional neural network autoencoder (AE) enhances target detection in automotive radar systems. This AE method outperforms traditional Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) algorithms, improving signal detection accuracy.

Keywords:
autoencoderconstant false alarm ratefrequency-modulated continuous wave radarmultiple-input and multiple-outputtarget detection

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.4K
Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

7.9K
Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.4K
Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Radar Systems Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence in Automotive Technology
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) algorithms are standard for target detection in automotive Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar.
  • Improper parameter settings in CFAR algorithms can significantly degrade target detection performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a convolutional neural network-based autoencoder (AE) as an alternative to CFAR algorithms for target detection in Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) FMCW radar systems.
  • To optimize the AE architecture for improved signal-to-noise ratio in target detection results.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a convolutional neural network-based autoencoder (AE) to replace conventional CFAR algorithms.
  • The AE compresses detection results at the encoder and recovers significant signal components at the decoder.
  • Systematically varied the number of hidden layers and filters within the AE to determine optimal structure for high signal-to-noise ratio.

Main Results:

  • The proposed AE-based target detection method demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional CFAR algorithms.
  • Correlation coefficients were calculated between AE detection results and actual target positions.
  • The AE-based method achieved a high similarity with a correlation coefficient of 0.73 or higher.

Conclusions:

  • The convolutional neural network autoencoder offers a promising approach for enhancing target detection in automotive MIMO FMCW radar systems.
  • The AE method provides a more robust and accurate alternative to traditional CFAR algorithms, especially when CFAR parameters are sub-optimal.
  • Optimizing AE architecture is crucial for achieving high signal-to-noise ratios and improved detection accuracy.