Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
Jan W Eriksson1, Björn Eliasson2,3, Louise Bennet4,5
1Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Diabetes and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. jan.eriksson@medsci.uu.se.
Abstract:
This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining. This is due to many environmental factors acting in concert, including the prioritisation of funding for other diseases, high costs of large randomised clinical trials, increase in regulatory requirements and limited entry of novel candidate drugs. There is a need for novel and cost-effective paradigms of clinical development to meet these and other challenges. The concept of registry-based randomised clinical trials (RRCTs) is an attractive option. In this review we focus on type 2 diabetes and the prevention of cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidities and mortality, using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as an example of an RRCT. We also give some examples from other disease areas. The RRCT concept is a novel, cost-effective and scientifically sound approach for conducting large-scale diabetes trials in a real-world setting.
Insights
Registry-based randomized clinical trials (RRCTs) offer a novel, cost-effective solution for conducting large-scale diabetes research. This approach addresses declining clinical trial numbers and aims to improve outcomes for type 2 diabetes and its comorbidities.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Clinical Trial Design
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Clinical drug development in diabetes faces challenges, including declining trial numbers due to funding shifts, high costs, and regulatory hurdles.
- Despite recent advances, novel and cost-effective clinical development paradigms are needed to sustain research in type 2 diabetes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate registry-based randomized clinical trials (RRCTs) as a viable approach for diabetes clinical development.
- To highlight the potential of RRCTs in addressing challenges in conducting large-scale trials for type 2 diabetes and its comorbidities.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of clinical drug development in diabetes.
- Focus on registry-based randomized clinical trials (RRCTs) using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as a case study.
- Exploration of RRCTs for cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidity prevention in type 2 diabetes.
Main Results:
- Registry-based randomized clinical trials (RRCTs) present an attractive, cost-effective, and scientifically sound alternative for large-scale diabetes trials.
- The SMARTEST trial exemplifies the successful implementation of RRCTs in a real-world setting.
- RRCTs can facilitate research in type 2 diabetes and the prevention of associated complications.
Conclusions:
- Registry-based randomized clinical trials (RRCTs) offer a promising paradigm for future diabetes research.
- This innovative approach can overcome current limitations in clinical trial funding and execution.
- RRCTs are essential for advancing the understanding and management of type 2 diabetes and its complications.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

