Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Measuring and Manipulating Functionally Specific Neural Pathways in the Human Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 23, 2020
Effects of stimulus waveform on transcranial magnetic stimulation metrics in proximal and distal arm muscles
Christopher Lynch1, Thibault Roumengous1, Neil Mittal1
1Virginia Commonwealth University, Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation Engineering to Advance Ability Lab (REALab), Biotech Eight, Room 421, 737 North 5th Street, Richmond, VA 23219, United States.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of common transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) waveforms (monophasic and biphasic) on resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes in the biceps and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) because waveforms may affect motor targets differently. We also determined test-retest reliability.
Methods:
Ten individuals participated in two sessions of TMS delivered to the motor cortex. Monophasic stimulation to induce a posterior-anterior current in the brain (monoPA) and biphasic posterior-anterior then anterior-posterior (biPA-AP) were applied in each session in random order. In each session, there were four blocks of measurements (2 muscles × 2 waveforms) of RMT, AMT and MEPs at the hotspot location. MEPs were normalized to the maximum EMG signal.
Results:
RMTs and AMTs were lower for monoPA compared to biPA-AP stimulation for the biceps (p<0.01) and FDI (p<0.01). Normalized MEPs were greater for monoPA compared to biPA-AP stimulation in the FDI (p=0.01) and not different in the biceps (p=0.86). Motor thresholds were not different between sessions suggesting high reliability (p<0.01). Normalized MEPs had very low reliability across sessions in the FDI, and moderate reliability in the biceps.
Discussion:
Preliminary investigation suggests the effect of TMS waveform on motor thresholds is similar in upper limb proximal and distal muscles, but the effect differs per motor target for MEPs. Further, test-retest reliability of waveform effects was sensitive to target muscle. These findings may contribute to improve the efficacy and reliability of TMS for clinical use.
More Related Videos
12:19Utilizing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Study the Human Neuromuscular System
Published on: January 20, 2012
14:47Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
Published on: April 21, 2023