Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
Why do experts disagree? The development of a taxonomy
Kristine Deroover1, Simon Knight, Paul F Burke1
1University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
Abstract:
People are increasingly exposed to conflicting health information and must navigate this information to make numerous decisions, such as which foods to consume, a process many find difficult. Although some consumers attribute these disagreements to aspects related to uncertainty and complexity of research, many use a narrower set of credibility-based explanations. Experts' views on disagreements are underinvestigated and lack explicit identification and classification of the differences in causes for disagreement. Consequently, there is a gap in existing literature to understand the range of reasons for these contradictions. Combining the findings from a literature study and expert interviews, a taxonomy of disagreements was developed. It identifies 10 types of disagreement classified under three dimensions: informant-, information- and uncertainty-related causes for disagreement. The taxonomy may assist with adoption of more effective strategies to deal with conflicting information and contributes to research and practice of science communication in the context of disagreement.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Taxonomy
Hierarchy of Taxonomy
The hierarchy that Carolus Linnaeus first...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Uncertainty: Overview
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...

