Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Emergency Medical Services Clinicians' Perspectives on Pediatric Non-Transport
Caleb E Ward1,2, Judith Singletary3, Rachel E Hatcliffe1,2
1Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Insights
Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians often do not transport children, with decisions made collaboratively with caregivers. Implementing EMS-led non-transport protocols requires clear guidelines and caregiver support.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Care
- Healthcare Decision-Making
Background:
- Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians do not transport approximately one-third of assessed children, despite the absence of formal pediatric non-transport protocols.
- Understanding the decision-making process between EMS clinicians and caregivers regarding pediatric non-transport is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe current EMS clinician decision-making processes for pediatric non-transport.
- To identify barriers and enablers for implementing EMS clinician-initiated pediatric non-transport protocols.
Main Methods:
- Six virtual focus groups were conducted with EMS clinicians from the mid-Atlantic region.
- A semi-structured moderator guide was used, and transcripts were analyzed using axial coding to identify themes.
Main Results:
- Non-transport decisions typically involve shared decision-making between EMS clinicians and caregivers, with caregivers making the final transport decision.
- Factors influencing non-transport include agency protocols, caregiver preferences, guardian presence, clinician variability, and proximity to the emergency department.
- Enablers for EMS-initiated non-transport include user-friendly interfaces, clear protocols, vital sign integration, caregiver resources, and medical oversight.
Conclusions:
- Current pediatric non-transport is primarily a caregiver decision, though EMS clinicians provide crucial advice.
- Further research is necessary to evaluate the safety of current non-transport practices.
- The study suggests a potential need for developing EMS-initiated protocols for alternative dispositions or non-transport.
Objectives:
Emergency medical services clinicians do not transport one-third of all children assessed, even without official pediatric non-transport protocols. Little is known about how EMS clinicians and caregivers decide not to transport a child. Our objectives were to describe how EMS clinicians currently decide whether or not to transport a child and identify barriers to and enablers of successfully implementing an EMS clinician-initiated pediatric non-transport protocol.
Methods:
We conducted six virtual focus groups with EMS clinicians from the mid-Atlantic. A PhD trained facilitator moderated all groups using a semi-structured moderator guide. Multiple investigators independently coded a deidentified sample transcript. One team member then completed axial coding of the remaining transcripts. Thematic saturation was achieved. Clusters of similar codes were grouped into themes by consensus.
Results:
We recruited 50 participants, of whom 70% were paramedics and 28% emergency medical technicians. There was agreement that caregivers often use 9-1-1 for low acuity complaints. Participants stated that non-transport usually occurs after shared decision-making between EMS clinicians and caregivers; EMS clinicians advise whether transport is necessary, but caregivers are responsible for making the final decision and signing refusal documentation. Subthemes for how non-transport decisions were made included the presence of agency protocols, caregiver preferences, absence of a guardian on the scene, EMS clinician variability, and distance to the nearest ED. Participants identified the following features that would enable successful implementation of an EMS clinician-initiated non-transport process: a user-friendly interface, clear protocol endpoints, the inclusion of vital sign parameters, resources to leave with caregivers, and optional direct medical oversight.
Conclusions:
EMS clinicians in our study agreed that non-transport is currently a caregiver decision, but noted a collaborative process of shared decision-making where EMS clinicians advise caregivers whether transport is indicated. Further research is needed to understand the safety of this practice. This study suggests there may be a need for EMS-initiated alternative disposition/non-transport protocols.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Obedience
Ethical Dilemmas II
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use

