The Impact of Laser-Activated and Conventional Irrigation Techniques on Sealer Penetration into Dentinal Tubules

The present study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) by using various final irrigation techniques on penetration of sealer. Traditional irrigation of root canals with a syringe limits the ability of sealer penetration. Various irrigants and activation techniques, including sonic and ultrasonic devices and various kinds of lasers, have been introduced to improve penetration of sealers into dentinal tubules. One hundred mandibular premolars were selected. Final irrigation was performed with HEDP or EDTA by conventional syringe irrigation (CI), EndoActivator (EA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) methods (n = 10). After obturation of root canals with the EndoSequence BC Sealer, samples were evaluated using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM), which enabled measurement of the maximum depth, percentage, and penetration area. Tests performed for analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U tests. In the EA method, the penetration percentage achieved using HEDP was significantly higher than EDTA at both sections (p < 0.05). Irrespective of the final irrigation solution employed, the PUI, PIPS, and SWEEPS techniques exhibited greater tubule penetration values compared with the CI and EA techniques (p < 0.05). HEDP and EDTA showed similar effects on the amount of penetrated sealer into the dentinal tubules, and the PUI, PIPS and SWEEPS methods provided enhanced EndoSequence BC Sealer penetration compared with the CI and EA methods. This study was approved by the Near East University institutional review board (#2020/86-1225).