The Rydel Seiffer tuning fork - Age and gender matter

The Rydel Seiffer tuning fork (RSTF) can be easily applied to evaluate deficits of vibration perception. Standard normative data as stated in textbooks (6/8-thresholds among the "elderly") is not suitable for an informed decision-making process.

To reevaluate the range of vibration detection thresholds (VDT) based on assessments in healthy Caucasians stratified for age and gender using the RSTF and on a short-review of literature on normative data on PubMed.

Monocentric, prospective assessment of VDT at the dorsal 1st metatarsophalangeal joint of both sides in 77 healthy volunteers. Participants were grouped according to age: 20-39 years (group I, n = 24), 40-59 years (group II, n = 29), 60-79 years (group III, n = 24). Data was stratified for gender. Means were compared via Mann-Whitney U-test; correlations were rated via Pearson correlation coefficient. A short-review of literature was performed on PubMed.

Aging related to declined vibration perception (r = -0.446, p < 0.001). Women aged 60 years and older showed better vibration perception compared to men (men: 6.5 ± 1.3, women: 7.5 ± 0.9, p = 0.003). All VDT-limits were higher compared to results gathered in literature (I: 7.9 ± 0.3, II: 7.7 ± 0.5, III: 7.1 ± 1.1). Formerly reported VDT-limits at the lower limbs were scattered (e.g., >4.5/8 to ≥6.6/8 at age 18-29). Current data, especially VDT of participants aged 50 years and older, were largely in line with data reported by Hilz et al. 1998: 18-29 years: ≥ 6.6/8, 30-39 years: ≥ 5.5/8, 40-49 years: ≥ 5.7/8, 50-59 years: ≥ 5.4/8, 60-69 years ≥ 5.2/8, > 70 years ≥ 5.3/8, alternative: 30-39 years ≥ 6.2/8 Magerl et al. 2010. Data on diagnostic sensitivity by Xirou et al. 2020 supported a VDT-limit of 5.9/8 across all ages to aim for high sensitivity. A better vibration perception among elder women compared to men has been described by many studies.

The current data and literature underline, that higher VDT-limits stratified for age and gender should be considered in a clinical setting. Until further validation within larger samples, we propose to consider the limits as reported by Hilz et al. 1998. Furthermore, women at age 60 + years presenting with borderline thresholds should be considered for further diagnostic workup.