Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: April 7, 2021
Development of a Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress
Prakadeshwari Rajapreyar1,2, Jenny Andres2, Christina Pano2
1Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Insights
This study developed a protocol to identify pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) patients and standardize care. The approach improved patient identification and adherence to ventilator management guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) presents significant management challenges with high mortality rates.
- Standardizing care for PARDS is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Existing methods for identifying PARDS patients and implementing guidelines require optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the development and implementation of a protocolized approach for identifying PARDS patients.
- To institute evidence-based ventilator management guidelines for PARDS.
- To utilize quality improvement methodologies for refining PARDS care.
Main Methods:
- Utilized electronic health record (EHR) best practice alerts (BPA) to identify patients meeting Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) criteria for PARDS.
- Employed the Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) methodology for iterative quality improvement cycles.
- Monitored adherence to management guidelines using statistical process control (SPC) charts.
Main Results:
- The BPA system successfully identified PARDS patients, with a significant reduction in false alerts from 66.7% to 29.2% after the second cycle (p < 0.001).
- Patient enrollment in the management plan increased significantly from 48.3% to 73.2% (p = 0.03).
- SPC charts indicated a positive shift in adherence to tidal volume guidelines.
Conclusions:
- The SCAMP methodology effectively facilitated the development of institutional PARDS management guidelines.
- The protocolized approach aids in patient identification and monitoring adherence to care standards.
- This systematic process provides a foundation for assessing the impact of clinical practice guideline adherence in PARDS.
Abstract:
Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is one of the most challenging patient populations for a clinician to manage with mortality between 8 and 31%. The project was designed to identify patients with PARDS, implement management guidelines with the goal of standardizing practice. Our objectives were to describe the development and implementation of a protocolized approach to identify patients with PARDS and institute ventilator management guidelines. Patients who met criteria for moderate or severe PARDS as per the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) definitions were identified using the best practice alert (BPA) in the electronic health record (EHR). Patients who did not meet exclusion criteria qualified for management using the Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP), a quality improvement (QI) methodology with iterative cycles. The creation of a BPA enabled identification of patients with PARDS. With our second cycle, the number of false BPA alerts due to incorrect data decreased from 66.7 (68/102) to 29.2% (19/65; p < 0.001) and enrollment increased from 48.3 (14/29) to 73.2% (30/41; p = 0.03). Evaluation of our statistical process control chart (SPC) demonstrated a shift in the adherence with the tidal volume guideline. Overall, we found that SCAMP methodology, when used in the development of institutional PARDS management guidelines, allows for development of a process to aid identification of patients and monitor adherence to management guidelines. This should eventually allow assessment of impact of deviations from clinical practice guidelines.
More Related Videos
09:36Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
06:15Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management