Does Stereoelectroencephalography Add Value in Patients with Lesional Epilepsy?

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has gained popularity as an invasive monitoring modality for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localization. The need and indications for SEEG in patients with evident brain lesions or associated abnormalities on imaging is debated. We report our experience with SEEG as a presurgical evaluation tool for patients with lesional epilepsy.

A retrospective cohort study was performed of 131 patients with lesional or magnetic resonance imaging abnormality-associated medically refractory focal epilepsy who underwent resections from 2010 to 2017. Seventy-one patients had SEEG followed by resection, and 60 had no invasive recordings. Volumetric analysis of resection cavities from 3T magnetic resonance imaging was performed.

Mean lesion and resection volumes for SEEG and non-SEEG were 16.2 (standard deviation [SD] = 29) versus 23.7 cm³ (SD = 38.4) and 28.1 (SD = 23.2) versus 43.6 cm³ (SD = 43.5), respectively (P = 0.009). Comparing patients with seizure recurrence and patients who remained seizure free, significantly associated variables with seizure recurrence included mean number of failed antiseizure medications (6.86 [SD = 0.32] vs. 5.75 [SD = 0.32]; P = 0.01) and in SEEG patients the mean number of electrodes implanted (8.1 [SD = 0.8] vs. 5.0 [SD = 0.8]; P = 0.005). After multivariate analysis, only failed numbers of medication remained significantly associated with seizure recurrence.

Seizure outcomes did not correlate with final resection volume after SEEG evaluation. SEEG evaluation presurgically can be used to maintain the efficacy of resection and decrease the volume and subsequent risk of extensive tissue removal. We believe that this technology allows resective surgery to proceed in a subpopulation of patients with lesional epilepsy who may otherwise not have been considered surgical candidates.