Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer
Published on: May 10, 2024
Use of Palliative Interventions at End of Life for Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer
Vivi W Chen1,2, Jorge I Portuondo3, Zara Cooper4,5
1Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA. Vivi.Chen@bcm.edu.
Background:
Despite the well-established benefits of palliative care, little is known about the use of palliative interventions among patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer near the end of life (EOL).
Methods:
A national cohort study analyzed 142,304 patients with advanced GI cancers (stage 3 or 4) near EOL (death within 1 year of diagnosis) in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014) who received palliative interventions (defined as treatment to relieve symptoms: surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and/or pain management). The study used multivariable hierarchical regression evaluate the association between the use of palliative interventions, temporal trends, and patient and hospital factors.
Results:
Overall, 16.5% of the patients were treated with a palliative intervention, and use increased over time (13.4% in 2004 vs 19.8% in 2014; trend test, p < 0.001). Palliative interventions were used most frequently for esophageal cancer (20.6%) and least frequently for gallbladder cancer (13.3%). Palliative interventions were associated with younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-0.99), recent diagnosis year (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), black race (white [ref]; OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12), insurance status (no insurance [ref]; private: OR, 0.92; 95% CI ,0.95-0.99), hospital type (community cancer program [ref]; integrated network cancer programs: OR, 1.37; 95% CI ,1.07-1.75), and stage 4 disease (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 2.07-2.27). Patients in southern and western regions were less likely to receive palliative intervention (Northeast [ref]; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94 and OR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57, respectively).
Conclusion:
Increased palliative intervention use over time suggests ongoing changes in how care is delivered to GI cancer patients toward EOL. However, sociodemographic and geographic variation suggests opportunities to address barriers to optimal EOL care.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
09:02Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion PHP with Melphalan as a Treatment for Unresectable Metastases Confined to the Liver
Published on: July 31, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Continuing Care
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: