Effect of Roy's Adaptation, Model-based, Perioperative Nursing Service on Patients: A Clinical Observational Study

Surgery for early-stage lung carcinoma (LC) is invasive and most patients will experience psychological disorders, such as depression and anxiety. Accumulating evidence has shown that a nursing intervention can exert significant improvements in clinical efficacy for perioperative patients.

The study intended to investigate the clinical value during the perioperative period of a nursing service based on Roy's Adaptation Model (RAM), for patients undergoing radical resection for early-stage LC, to provide accurate guidance and reference for a future clinical nursing intervention for LC patients.

The research team designed a retrospective analysis, controlled study.

The study took place at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital in Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Participants were 69 patients with early-stage LC who had been admitted to the hospital between March 2018 and March 2020.

The research team assigned participants to an intervention or a control group, with 42 participants in the intervention group receiving RAM nursing during hospitalization, and 27 participants in the control group receiving routine nursing care.

The study measured the alterations in pulmonary function (PF) pre- and postoperatively and assessed the incidence of complications postintervention. At baseline and postintervention, the research team also assessed participants' psychological states using the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) and their pain levels using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Postintervention, participants competed a nursing satisfaction survey. At baseline and postintervention, the participants completed the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale for functional status, the Self-Perceived Burden Scale in Cancer Patients (SPBS-CP), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) for sleep quality, and the WHO-QOL-BREF questionnaire.

Postoperatively, the PF indexes had decreased significantly for both groups, but the intervention group's value were significantly higher postoperatively than those in the control group (P < .05). No differences existed in the incidence of adverse reactions between the groups (P > .05). The intervention group had significantly lower SAS and SDS scores, pain scores, and SPBS-CP scores than the control group postintervention but had significantly higher KPS scores (all P < .05). The intervention group significantly higher nursing satisfaction, sleep quality, and quality of life than the control group did (P < .05).

RAM nursing can significantly protect the PF of patients with early-stage LC who are undergoing a radical resection and can effectively improve patients' psychological states, sleep quality, and nursing satisfaction, which makes it worthy of clinical reference and popularization.