Toward semi-automatic biologically effective dose treatment plan optimisation for Gamma Knife radiosurgery
Thomas Klinge1,2,3, Hugues Talbot4, Ian Paddick5
1Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), Dept. Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
|August 12, 2022
Summary
Inverse planning optimizes Gamma Knife radiosurgery by controlling beam-on times and delivery sequence. This ensures consistent biologically effective dose (BED) regardless of treatment duration, improving plan quality.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Dose-rate effects in Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) cause variable biologically effective dose (BED) for identical physical doses.
- The non-convex BED model's dependence on delivery sequence complicates GKRS treatment planning.
- Existing GKRS planning methods may not account for dose-rate variations, impacting treatment consistency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the feasibility of inverse planning for GKRS to achieve desired BED characteristics.
- To optimize per-isocenter beam-on times and delivery sequence for consistent BED.
- To evaluate computational approaches for generating clinically relevant GKRS treatment plans.
Main Methods:
- Implemented two optimization algorithms: Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) and a faster local optimization approach.
- MILP utilized a convex underestimator for BED to address local minima, increasing computational complexity.
- Local optimization sequentially optimized beam-on times (quasi-Newton) and delivery sequence (local search).
Main Results:
- Local optimization converged significantly faster (minutes vs. hours/days) than MILP, achieving comparable objective function values (within 1.2%).
- Treatment plan quality metrics showed no meaningful differences between MILP and local optimization.
- Optimized plans eliminated treatment time dependence and promoted more conformal dose distributions.
Conclusions:
- Inverse planning is feasible within a reasonable timeframe for achieving BED-based objectives in GKRS.
- Optimized beam-on times and delivery sequences ensure consistent BED across varying treatment durations.
- This approach holds promise for enhancing GKRS treatment plan quality and consistency.


