Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Severe Renal Insufficiency Undergoing PCI for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Yunxian Chen1, Shaowen Tu1, Zhixin Chen1
1Department of Cardiology, Yue Bei People's Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shaoguan, China.
Insights
Ticagrelor did not improve outcomes for acute coronary syndrome patients with severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI compared to clopidogrel. However, ticagrelor significantly increased bleeding risk in this patient population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend potent antiplatelet agents post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
- Limited data exist on optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients with severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.
- This study addresses the efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in ACS patients with severe renal insufficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.
- To evaluate the impact of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding risk in this specific patient group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective enrollment of 276 patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency (eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m² or on dialysis) who underwent PCI.
- Analysis of 1-year outcomes using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, including a composite primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, MI recurrence, ischemic stroke), all-cause mortality, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding events.
- Comparison between patients treated with ticagrelor (n=108) and clopidogrel (n=168).
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in the adjusted risk of the primary endpoint (HR, 0.78; P=0.367) or all-cause mortality (HR, 0.86; P=0.708) between ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups.
- The ticagrelor group experienced a significantly higher risk of total bleeding (HR, 3.01; P=0.01) compared to the clopidogrel group.
- Subgroup analyses did not reveal significant heterogeneity in outcomes based on confounders.
Conclusions:
- Ticagrelor did not demonstrate superior efficacy over clopidogrel in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality in Chinese patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.
- Ticagrelor use was associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding in this patient population.
- The findings suggest that clopidogrel may be a safer alternative regarding bleeding risk in ACS patients with severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.
Background:
Current guidelines recommend the use of potent antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, data about optimal platelet inhibition in severe renal insufficiency patients are scarce. The purpose of this study is to determine if ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency treated with PCI.
Methods:
We retrospectively enrolled patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency (eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min·1.73 m2 or dialysis) who underwent PCI at our hospital between January 2015 and March 2020. We used the adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the 1-year outcome endpoints, including the primary endpoint (the composite of cardiovascular death, recurrence of MI, or nonfatal ischemic stroke), death from any cause, and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, BARC criteria).
Results:
A total of 276 patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency who were treated with PCI with ticagrelor (n = 108) or clopidogrel (n = 168) were included in the study. After adjustment, there was no statistical difference in risk of the primary endpoint (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.46-1.33; P=0.367) and death from any cause (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.38-1.89; P=0.708) in the ticagrelor group against the clopidogrel group. However, the risk of total bleeding was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.81-5.62; P=0.01). Subgroup analysis according to the confounders did not identify any significant subgroup heterogeneity.
Conclusion:
Ticagrelor did not improve the major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality when compared to clopidogrel, but significantly increased the risk of bleeding in Chinese patients with ACS and severe renal insufficiency undergoing PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...

