Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Health Care Leaders' Perspectives on the Maryland All-Payer Model
Austin S Kilaru1,2, Christina R Crider3, Joshua Chiang4
1Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Importance:
Since 2014, all hospitals in Maryland have operated under an all-payer global budget system. Hospital global budgets have gained renewed attention as a strategy for constraining cost growth, improving patient outcomes, and preserving health care access in rural and underserved communities. Lessons from the implementation of the Maryland All-Payer Model (MDAPM) may have implications for policy makers, payers, and hospitals in other settings seeking to adopt global budgets or other value-based payment models.
Objective:
To examine perspectives on the implementation of the MDAPM among health care leaders who participated in its design and execution.
Design Setting And Participants:
This qualitative study with semistructured telephone interviews was conducted from November 1, 2019, to February 11, 2020. The purposive sample of Maryland health care leaders represents diverse stakeholder groups, including hospitals, state government and regulatory agencies, the federal government, and payers.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Key high-level themes were extracted from interviews using qualitative content analysis, with barriers and facilitators to implementation specified within each theme.
Results:
A total of 20 interviews were conducted with hospital leaders (n = 6), state regulators (n = 4), federal regulators (n = 4), payer representatives (n = 3), and state leaders (n = 3). Key themes were labeled as (1) expectations (setting bold yet achievable goals), (2) autonomy (allowing hospitals to follow individual strategies within MDAPM parameters), (3) communication (encouraging early and ongoing communication between stakeholders), (4) actionable data (sharing useful hospital and patient-level data between stakeholders), (5) global budget calibration (anticipating technical challenges when negotiating budgets for individual hospitals), and (6) shared commitment to change (harnessing collective motivation for system change). Together, these themes suggest that implementing the payment model followed an evolving and collaborative process that requires stakeholder communication, data to guide decisions, and commitment to operating within the new payment system.
Conclusions And Relevance:
The implementation of hospital global budgets in the state of Maryland offers generalizable lessons that can inform the evolution and expansion of this approach to value-based payment in other states and settings.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Patient-centered Care
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...

